Today, do you make more money on Twitter/X or on Instagram?
This blog post has been written by the person who has mapped all the strategies and examples in our cheatsheets
Instagram continues to dominate creator earnings in 2025, generating roughly 3-4x more revenue per follower than Twitter/X across all tier levels.
The revenue gap becomes particularly stark at the million-follower mark, where Instagram creators can earn $40,000-$800,000 monthly compared to Twitter/X's $6,000-$25,000 range. However, Twitter/X offers more predictable ad-share payouts and lower competition for audience attention, making it viable for creators who prioritize consistent income streams over peak earning potential.
And if you need to fast-track your growth on X, check all our cheatsheets.
Summary
Instagram significantly outperforms Twitter/X in creator monetization across all metrics, from follower-to-revenue ratios to conversion rates and brand partnership rates.
| Metric | Instagram Performance | Twitter/X Performance |
|---|---|---|
| 10K Followers Monthly Earnings | $400-$4,000 (4-8 sponsored posts) | $550-$800 (ad share + partnerships) |
| 1M Followers Monthly Earnings | $40,000-$800,000 | $6,000-$25,000 |
| Revenue per 1K Impressions (Digital Products) | $20-$30 | $10-$15 |
| Brand Deal Rate per 1K Followers (Micro-tier) | $50-$300 | 60-80% of Instagram rates |
| Conversion Rate (Purchase) | 3% of add-to-cart | 2% of add-to-cart |
| Follower-to-Subscriber Conversion (30-day) | 3% overall | 2% overall |
| Algorithmic Reach (Impressions/Follower) | 1.2x (Reels) | 0.8x |
Steal What Works on 𝕏
Thousands of people have already tested what works.
Everything has been captured, mapped, and turned into cheat codes.
Grab them now.
What are the average monthly earnings for creators with 10K, 100K, and 1M followers on Twitter/X versus Instagram in 2025?
Instagram creators consistently earn 2-10x more than their Twitter/X counterparts at every follower tier, with the gap widening dramatically at higher levels.
| Follower Count | Instagram Monthly Earnings | Twitter/X Monthly Earnings |
|---|---|---|
| 10K Followers | $400-$4,000 (assuming 4-8 sponsored posts at $100-$500 each) | $550-$800 ($50-$300 ad share + occasional $500 brand deals) |
| 100K Followers | $4,000-$40,000 (4-8 posts at $1,000-$5,000 each) | $1,300-$6,000 ($300-$1,000 ad share + $1,000-$5,000 partnerships) |
| 1M Followers | $40,000-$800,000 (4-8 posts at $10,000-$100,000 each) | $6,000-$25,000 ($1,000-$5,000 ad share + $5,000-$20,000 brand deals) |
| Revenue Stream Split | Brand partnerships (30-35%), Affiliate sales (20-30%), Ad-share (10-15%) | Brand partnerships (30-35%), Affiliate sales (20-30%), Ad-share (10-15%) |
| Subscriptions/Tipping | 10-15% of total revenue | 10-15% of total revenue |
| Other Revenue (UGC, Events) | 5-10% of total revenue | 5-10% of total revenue |
| Peak Earning Potential | Significantly higher due to visual content premium | More consistent but lower ceiling |
The revenue distribution remains similar across platforms, but Instagram's higher per-post rates create substantially larger total earnings. Twitter/X creators often supplement with more frequent posting and community building.
How do conversion funnel metrics compare between Twitter/X and Instagram across different account sizes?
Instagram edges out Twitter/X in most conversion metrics, particularly in landing page engagement and final purchase rates.
Twitter/X achieves a slightly higher click-through rate at 1.0% versus Instagram's 0.8%, likely due to the platform's text-centric, link-friendly format. However, Instagram recovers this advantage through superior landing page view rates (60% vs 50%) and higher purchase conversion rates (3% vs 2% of add-to-cart actions).
The add-to-cart rate also favors Instagram at 12% versus Twitter/X's 10%, suggesting Instagram's visual content creates stronger purchase intent. These metrics remain relatively consistent across account size tiers, though larger accounts (500K+ followers) typically see 10-15% better performance across all funnel stages due to higher audience trust and engagement quality.
Account size does create some notable variations: nano-influencers (1K-10K followers) often achieve 20-30% higher conversion rates than mega-influencers due to stronger audience relationships, while mid-tier accounts (100K-500K followers) represent the sweet spot for balanced reach and conversion performance.
Not sure what content to post? We've already collected what works in our cheatsheets.
What is the current revenue per thousand impressions for different product types on each platform?
Instagram generates significantly higher revenue per thousand impressions across all product categories, with the gap being most pronounced for high-ticket coaching offers.
| Product Type | Instagram RPM | Twitter/X RPM |
|---|---|---|
| Physical Products | $15-$25 per 1K impressions | $8-$12 per 1K impressions |
| Digital Downloads | $20-$30 per 1K impressions | $10-$15 per 1K impressions |
| High-Ticket Coaching | $50-$80 per 1K impressions | $30-$50 per 1K impressions |
| Subscription Services | $25-$35 per 1K impressions | $15-$22 per 1K impressions |
| Software/SaaS | $30-$45 per 1K impressions | $20-$35 per 1K impressions |
| Affiliate Products | $10-$18 per 1K impressions | $6-$12 per 1K impressions |
| Courses/Education | $35-$55 per 1K impressions | $22-$40 per 1K impressions |
Instagram's visual-first approach creates stronger emotional connections with products, particularly for lifestyle and coaching offers. Twitter/X performs relatively better with B2B software and affiliate products where detailed explanations and community discussions drive conversions.
Which platform drives higher average order value and customer lifetime value in specific niches?
Instagram dominates in visual-heavy niches while Twitter/X shows competitive performance in discussion-based verticals like fitness advice and technical tutorials.
In parenting content, Instagram's visual storytelling creates 12% higher average order values and 10% better customer lifetime values, driven by emotional connection through family photos and lifestyle content. Personal finance sees Instagram leading by 8% in AOV and 5% in CLV, primarily through aspirational lifestyle content that motivates financial goal achievement.
The fitness niche presents an interesting reversal, where Twitter/X achieves 5% higher average order values despite Instagram's 7% CLV advantage. This occurs because Twitter/X's community-driven discussions around workout techniques and nutrition create higher-ticket coaching sales, while Instagram's visual content excels at supplement and equipment sales with better long-term retention.
Tech tutorials show Instagram's strongest performance differential, with 15% higher AOV and 12% better CLV. Visual step-by-step content and before-and-after demonstrations create stronger purchase conviction than Twitter/X's text-based explanations, though Twitter/X maintains advantages in software-focused tutorials where code snippets and technical discussions drive conversions.
Don't waste time guessing what converts. Steal all the proven strategies instead.
Don't reinvent
the wheel
There are proven patterns that work. Proven formats. Proven hooks.
Everything has been captured, mapped, and turned into cheat codes.
How have ad-share payouts trended throughout 2025 and what are the 2026 projections?
Both platforms showed steady quarterly growth in ad-share payouts during 2025, with Instagram maintaining a significant premium over Twitter/X rates.
Twitter/X ad-share payouts per 1,000 eligible impressions progressed from $8.50 in Q1 to $9.25 in Q4, representing an 8.8% annual increase. Instagram's in-feed payouts climbed from $15.00 to $16.50 over the same period, a 10% growth rate that outpaced Twitter/X's improvements.
The consistent quarterly increases of approximately $0.25 for Twitter/X and $0.50 for Instagram reflect improving advertiser demand and platform algorithm optimizations. Instagram's higher base rates stem from superior engagement metrics and demographic targeting capabilities that command premium advertising rates.
2026 projections suggest continued growth with Twitter/X reaching approximately $9.50 per thousand impressions and Instagram hitting $17.00. These projections assume stable economic conditions and maintained advertiser spending levels, though economic volatility could impact these estimates by ±15%.
What proportion of creator revenue comes from in-platform tools versus off-platform funnels?
Both platforms see the majority of creator revenue generated through off-platform funnels, with Instagram showing slightly lower reliance on external monetization.
Twitter/X creators derive 30% of revenue from in-platform tools (Subscriptions, Tips, Super Follows) while 70% comes from off-platform channels including email marketing, Shopify stores, and external affiliate programs. This heavy off-platform reliance reflects Twitter/X's strength as a traffic-driving platform rather than a direct commerce environment.
Instagram shows a similar but slightly more balanced split with 25% from in-platform tools (Subscriptions, Live Gifts, Shop features) and 75% from off-platform funnels. Instagram's marginally higher in-platform percentage stems from more developed native commerce features and the platform's visual nature supporting direct product showcasing.
The off-platform dominance on both platforms highlights the importance of building owned audiences through email lists and external websites. Successful creators use social platforms primarily for audience building and traffic generation, then monetize through higher-converting owned channels where they control the customer relationship and avoid platform revenue sharing.
What are the current brand deal rates per 1,000 followers across influencer tiers in 2025?
Instagram commands premium brand partnership rates across all influencer tiers, with Twitter/X typically achieving 60-80% of Instagram's rates depending on niche and engagement quality.
| Influencer Tier | Follower Range | Instagram Rate per 1K | Twitter/X Rate per 1K |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nano-Influencers | 1K-10K | $10-$50 | $6-$40 (60-80% of Instagram) |
| Micro-Influencers | 10K-100K | $50-$300 | $30-$240 (60-80% of Instagram) |
| Mid-Tier Influencers | 100K-500K | $300-$1,000 | $180-$800 (60-80% of Instagram) |
| Macro-Influencers | 500K-1M | $1,000-$5,000 | $600-$4,000 (60-80% of Instagram) |
| Top-Paying Verticals (Instagram) | All Tiers | Beauty, Fashion, Lifestyle, Travel | Finance, Tech, B2B Software, Crypto |
| Top-Paying Verticals (Twitter/X) | All Tiers | Finance/Fintech, Tech, SaaS, Crypto | B2B Services, Developer Tools |
| Engagement Premium | All Tiers | +20-50% for >5% engagement rate | +25-60% for >3% engagement rate |
Finance, fintech, and tech verticals consistently pay the highest rates on Twitter/X, often reaching the upper end of the 60-80% range relative to Instagram. These niches value Twitter/X's engaged professional audience and discussion-friendly format for B2B messaging.
If your engagement feels flat, we've mapped all the formats that get traction.
How do paid advertising costs and demographics compare between Twitter/X and Instagram ads?
Instagram achieves slightly lower median cost per acquisition at $4-$6 compared to Twitter/X's $5-$7 range, while offering access to a more demographically diverse audience.
The $1-$2 CPA difference stems from Instagram's superior visual ad formats and more sophisticated targeting algorithms that improve conversion efficiency. Instagram's feed-based browsing behavior also creates a more receptive environment for promotional content compared to Twitter/X's fast-moving timeline format.
Demographic differences significantly impact campaign performance, with Twitter/X skewing approximately 15% more male than Instagram's more balanced gender split. Twitter/X's audience also trends older and more professionally focused, making it ideal for B2B campaigns and high-consideration purchases where decision-making involves research and discussion.
Geographic targeting reveals Instagram's strength in reaching international audiences with localized content, while Twitter/X excels at targeting specific professional communities and interest-based groups that transcend geographic boundaries. Campaign success often depends on matching platform demographics to target customer profiles rather than purely optimizing for lowest CPA.
Which platform converts more followers into paying subscribers within 30 days?
Instagram achieves a 3% overall follower-to-subscriber conversion rate within 30 days, outperforming Twitter/X's 2% rate, though performance varies significantly by content niche.
Visual-centric niches see Instagram's advantage expand to 4% conversion rates compared to Twitter/X's 1.5%, driven by Instagram's superior content formats for showcasing subscription value through behind-the-scenes content, tutorials, and lifestyle imagery. The visual proof of subscriber benefits creates stronger conversion motivation than text-based descriptions.
Text-centric niches reverse this dynamic, with Twitter/X achieving 3% conversions versus Instagram's 2%. Newsletter writers, financial analysts, and industry commentators benefit from Twitter/X's discussion-oriented format where subscribers seek ongoing insights and community participation rather than visual content.
The 30-day window proves critical as both platforms show conversion rate drops of 40-50% when measured at 60 or 90 days. Successful creators implement immediate value delivery through welcome sequences and exclusive content drops to capitalize on initial follower enthusiasm and social proof from recent follows.
What are the subscription churn rates and retention strategies for each platform?
Twitter/X faces higher baseline churn rates but shows greater improvement potential through community-building tactics compared to Instagram's more stable but harder-to-optimize retention patterns.
| Retention Metric | Twitter/X Performance | Instagram Performance |
|---|---|---|
| 6-Month Churn Rate (Baseline) | 45% standard churn | 40% standard churn |
| 12-Month Churn Rate (Baseline) | 65% standard churn | 60% standard churn |
| Improved 6-Month (Live Events) | 35% with regular Twitter Spaces | 30% with exclusive IG Live sessions |
| Improved 12-Month (Content Strategy) | 55% with community engagement | 50% with exclusive visual content |
| Most Effective Retention Tactic | Live discussion events and Q&As | Exclusive behind-the-scenes content |
| Retention Improvement Ceiling | Up to 22% improvement possible | Up to 17% improvement possible |
| Platform-Specific Strategies | Thread series, community polls, direct replies | Stories exclusives, IGTV tutorials, carousel posts |
Twitter/X's higher baseline churn reflects the platform's news-cycle driven engagement patterns where subscribers may lose interest during quiet periods. However, live events and community engagement create stronger retention improvements, suggesting Twitter/X subscribers value interactive experiences over passive content consumption.
Fast-Track Your Growth on 𝕏
You don't need to test everything and waste time.
Fast-track your growth by downloading what already works.
How does algorithmic reach translate into revenue growth on each platform?
Instagram's superior algorithmic reach of 1.2x impressions per follower compared to Twitter/X's 0.8x directly correlates with higher revenue generation potential per follower acquired.
The 50% reach advantage translates into Instagram generating approximately $20 in incremental revenue per additional 1,000 followers compared to Twitter/X's $10. This 2:1 revenue ratio stems from both higher impression volumes and superior conversion rates on Instagram's visually-optimized content formats.
Instagram Reels receive the strongest algorithmic boost, often achieving 2-3x account follower count in impressions for viral content. This reach multiplication creates exponential revenue opportunities for creators who master short-form video content, particularly in trending audio or hashtag categories.
Twitter/X's lower reach reflects the platform's chronological timeline preferences and lower engagement rates per impression. However, Twitter/X impressions often generate higher-quality engagement through replies and retweets that build community relationships, creating long-term revenue value that raw impression metrics don't capture. Strategic creators leverage Twitter/X for audience building and relationship development, then monetize through email lists and external platforms.
No idea what to tweet today? Browse hundreds of real viral examples.
What revenue forecasts should creators expect from 2026 monetization updates?
Both platforms announce significant monetization enhancements for 2026, with Twitter/X focusing on subscription improvements while Instagram expands commerce integration and ad-share programs.
- Twitter/X Revenue Projections: +5% ad-share payouts through improved advertiser demand, +10% subscription revenue via enhanced community features and creator tools, -2% brand deal rates due to increased creator supply and platform competition
- Instagram Revenue Projections: +8% ad-share payouts driven by Reels monetization expansion, +5% subscription revenue through Creator Subscriptions rollout, +3% brand deal rates from improved creator-brand matching tools
- New Revenue Streams: Twitter/X introducing tiered subscription models and virtual event monetization, Instagram launching shopping ads revenue sharing and AI-powered affiliate matching
- Platform Policy Changes: Both platforms reducing revenue sharing fees for creators above certain engagement thresholds, with Twitter/X offering 90% revenue retention for top-tier creators and Instagram providing 85% for verified creators
- Economic Impact Factors: Projections assume stable advertising markets, though economic downturns could reduce forecasts by 15-25% while economic growth could increase them by 10-20%
The divergent strategies reflect each platform's strengths, with Twitter/X leveraging community engagement for subscription growth while Instagram capitalizes on visual commerce for transaction-based revenue. Creators should diversify across both platforms to maximize total revenue potential and hedge against platform-specific risks.
Conclusion
Instagram emerges as the clear winner for pure revenue generation, particularly for creators seeking maximum earning potential from visual content and brand partnerships.
However, Twitter/X offers more predictable income streams and superior community-building capabilities that translate into long-term subscriber relationships and off-platform monetization success.
Sources
- Typefully - X Twitter Monetization Guide
- TweetDelete - Does Twitter Pay You
- Twesocial - Twitter Pay Per Million Views
- SocialBee - How to Make Money on Twitter
- CreatorsJet - Twitter Money Calculator
- Epidemic Sound - X Twitter Monetization
- PushBio - Twitter Pay for Followers
- Hilltop Ads - X vs The World Monetization
- LinkedIn - How to Earn Money Instagram 2025
- BossWallah - Instagram Followers to Get Paid
- BossWallah - Instagram Reels Million Views Money
- Reuters - X Annual Ad Revenue Growth
- Hilltop Ads - Publisher Twitter X Success
- JKS Digital - Earn Money Instagram 2025
- Scrumball - Instagram Influencers Income 2025
- Momentum Virtual Tours - Instagram Million Followers Pay
- Yahoo Finance - X Financial Reports
- Jay Mehta - How Much Influencers Make
- David Rivero - 2025 Social Media Monetization
- Influencer Marketing Hub - Benchmark Report
- CreatorsJet - Creator Income Breakdown
- Influencer Marketing Hub - 2025 Predictions
- Later - Influencer Benchmarks