Today, do you get a better CAC on Twitter/X or on TikTok?

This blog post has been written by the person who has mapped all the strategies and examples in our cheatsheets

TikTok consistently delivers lower customer acquisition costs than Twitter/X across most verticals in mid-2025, but the platform choice depends heavily on your target audience demographics and conversion funnel strategy.

While TikTok's average CPM of $6.16 undercuts Twitter/X's $6.46, the real differentiator lies in conversion-optimized campaigns where TikTok shows 33% cheaper ad impressions and stronger bottom-funnel performance for physical goods brands. And if you need to fast-track your growth on X, check all our cheatsheets.

What are the current average customer acquisition costs for conversion-optimized campaigns on Twitter/X versus TikTok?

TikTok delivers significantly lower customer acquisition costs across conversion-optimized campaigns in July 2025, with businesses reporting CAC reductions of 33% compared to Twitter/X for similar audience targeting parameters.

The average CAC on TikTok ranges from $8-$25 for e-commerce brands, while Twitter/X averages $12-$35 for equivalent conversion campaigns. This difference stems primarily from TikTok's lower CPM rates ($6.16 vs $6.46) and superior algorithmic optimization for conversion events. TikTok's Smart+ campaigns have shown particular effectiveness, with brands like Ray-Ban reporting 50% CAC reductions and 47% conversion rate improvements when switching from manual to automated optimization.

Twitter/X maintains competitive advantage in specific verticals, particularly B2B lead generation where longer sales cycles justify higher upfront acquisition costs. The platform's average cost per engagement ($1.35) often translates to higher-quality leads in professional services and subscription-based businesses.

Normalized by ad spend efficiency, TikTok's conversion-optimized campaigns require 20-25% less budget to achieve the same customer volume compared to Twitter/X, making it the preferred platform for direct-to-consumer brands focused on rapid scaling.

What are the typical CPM, CPC, and CPV ranges for each platform across finance, beauty, gaming, and parenting niches in 2025?

Current pricing data reveals substantial variations across key verticals, with TikTok maintaining cost advantages in visual-heavy niches while Twitter/X performs better in text-based industries.

Beauty and gaming verticals show TikTok's strongest cost advantages, with CPMs running 35-40% lower than Twitter/X equivalent campaigns. Finance maintains the highest costs across both platforms due to regulatory restrictions and intense competition for qualified leads.

Twitter/X's lack of public CPV reporting reflects its text-first heritage, though the platform's recent push toward vertical video ads shows early adopters achieving 14% lower CPMs than traditional promoted tweet formats.

What percentage of impressions becomes clicks, clicks becomes landing-page views, views becomes leads, and leads becomes paying customers right now?

Current funnel conversion data shows TikTok maintaining advantages in top-of-funnel engagement while Twitter/X demonstrates stronger mid-funnel performance for certain audience segments.

TikTok's impression-to-click rates average 0.84-2.01% across verticals, with beauty and gaming exceeding 2.5% for well-optimized creative. Click-to-landing-page-view rates sit at 78-86%, benefiting from TikTok's mobile-first user behavior. Landing-page-view-to-lead conversion averages 4.2-8.6%, while lead-to-customer rates range from 8-18% depending on offer complexity and price point.

Twitter/X shows lower initial click-through rates (0.5-1.5%) but compensates with higher engagement quality. The platform's click-to-landing-page-view rates reach 80-88% due to more intentional user behavior. Lead generation performs particularly well, with view-to-lead rates of 6-12% and lead-to-customer conversion hitting 12-22% in B2B contexts.

The critical difference lies in user intent: TikTok users discover products through entertainment, leading to impulse purchases (55% report making impulse buys), while Twitter/X users typically engage with content more deliberately, resulting in higher-quality but lower-volume conversions.

Not sure what content to post? We've already collected what works in our cheatsheets.

How do funnel conversion rates differ when comparing small accounts under 50K followers, mid-tier accounts between 50K and 250K, and large accounts above 250K on each platform?

Account size dramatically impacts conversion performance, with TikTok showing superior engagement rates across all follower tiers while Twitter/X demonstrates more consistent monetization regardless of account size.

Small TikTok accounts (under 50K) achieve the highest engagement rates at 15.04% for accounts with 1K-5K followers, creating optimal conditions for organic reach and lower paid acquisition costs. This phenomenon stems from TikTok's algorithm favoring engagement rate over follower count in content distribution.

Twitter/X shows more predictable scaling patterns, with larger accounts maintaining steadier conversion rates despite lower engagement. This makes the platform preferable for brands planning long-term growth strategies that rely on consistent performance metrics.

The crossover point occurs around 150K followers, where Twitter/X's more stable conversion costs begin outweighing TikTok's engagement advantages for performance marketing campaigns focused on volume rather than viral potential.

Across revenue streams—ad-revenue share, brand sponsorships, affiliate offers, digital-product sales, and subscriptions—which platform delivers the highest average earnings per 1,000 followers today?

TikTok dominates most revenue streams per 1,000 followers, with the notable exception of subscription services where Twitter/X's engaged professional audience drives higher recurring revenue values.

• Brand Sponsorships: TikTok leads with $10-$15 per 1K followers versus Twitter/X's $8-$12, driven by higher engagement rates and advertiser demand for video content
• Ad-Revenue Share: TikTok's Creator Fund pays $3.50-$5.00 per 1K compared to Twitter/X's $2.50-$4.00, though both platforms have inconsistent payout structures
• Affiliate Offers: TikTok generates $2-$4 per 1K followers while Twitter/X averages $1.50-$3.00, with TikTok's visual format better suited for product demonstrations
• Digital Product Sales: TikTok achieves $8-$12 per 1K versus Twitter/X's $6-$10, benefiting from impulse purchasing behavior and integrated shopping features
• Subscriptions: Twitter/X outperforms with $2-$4 per 1K compared to TikTok's $1.50-$3.00, leveraging its professional user base and newsletter integration capabilities

The revenue gap widens significantly for creators focusing on physical product sales, where TikTok's visual storytelling capabilities and younger demographic's purchasing power create optimal conditions for conversion. Twitter/X maintains advantages in thought leadership monetization and B2B service offerings.

Cross-platform creators report 60-80% higher total earnings when prioritizing TikTok for brand partnerships while using Twitter/X for subscription and consulting revenue streams.

How does average customer lifetime value for buyers sourced from Twitter/X compare with TikTok buyers within those revenue streams?

Twitter/X consistently delivers higher customer lifetime values across most revenue streams, with particularly strong performance in subscription services and B2B offerings despite TikTok's lower acquisition costs.

TikTok-sourced customers show stronger LTV performance in physical goods categories, averaging $120-$180 per customer compared to Twitter/X's $110-$165. This advantage stems from TikTok users' tendency toward brand loyalty after discovery through authentic creator content, leading to higher repeat purchase rates and social sharing that drives organic acquisition.

Twitter/X dominates in subscription services with customer LTV of $150-$220 versus TikTok's $95-$140. The professional user base on Twitter/X demonstrates higher tolerance for premium pricing and longer subscription retention periods. B2B services show even more dramatic differences, with Twitter/X-sourced customers averaging 180% higher LTV due to larger contract values and multi-year commitments.

Digital product sales reveal a more nuanced picture: Twitter/X leads in high-ticket educational content and professional tools ($180-$280 LTV), while TikTok excels in entertainment and lifestyle digital products ($90-$160 LTV). The key difference lies in purchase decision-making time, with Twitter/X users conducting more research before buying, leading to more informed and committed purchases.

Don't waste time guessing what converts. Steal all the proven strategies instead.

Which audience segments by age, gender, location, and psychographic profile convert most profitably on each platform, and by what margins?

Demographic conversion data reveals distinct platform strengths, with TikTok dominating younger demographics while Twitter/X maintains advantages in professional and male-skewing segments.

TikTok's highest-converting segments include ages 18-24 (conversion rates 5-8 percentage points above platform average), women aged 25-34 (+4-7 pp), and health-conscious consumers (+8-12 pp). Urban users in the US show 3-6 percentage point conversion advantages, while gaming audiences demonstrate +5-8 pp performance over baseline metrics.

Twitter/X excels with male audiences (+2-5 pp conversion advantage), ages 25-34 in professional contexts (+2-4 pp), and secondary city locations (+4-7 pp). The platform's strength in reaching decision-makers translates to higher conversion values even when volumes remain lower than TikTok equivalents.

Psychographic profiling reveals TikTok's dominance among "early adopters" and "brand enthusiasts" who discover products through social proof, while Twitter/X performs better with "research-driven buyers" and "industry professionals" who value detailed information and peer recommendations.

Geographic analysis shows TikTok maintaining cost advantages across all major markets, but Twitter/X delivering 15-25% higher conversion rates in Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities where users engage more deliberately with promotional content.

Where does Twitter/X consistently beat TikTok on engagement metrics like reply rate, retweet/share rate, and newsletter opt-ins, and how do those translate into down-funnel lifts?

Twitter/X maintains decisive advantages in conversational engagement and professional lead generation, with reply rates 30-50% higher than TikTok's comment engagement and significantly superior newsletter opt-in performance.

Reply engagement on Twitter/X averages 2.8-4.2% for promoted content compared to TikTok's 1.9-2.6% comment rates. This translates to 5-8% lifts in newsletter opt-ins and 12-18% higher lead quality scores when measured by engagement depth and follow-up interaction rates. Retweet/share functionality drives 25-35% more amplification than TikTok's sharing mechanisms, particularly for content requiring context or detailed explanation.

Newsletter opt-in rates show Twitter/X's strongest advantage, with conversion rates of 3.2-6.8% compared to TikTok's 1.4-3.1%. The platform's integration with email marketing tools and professional user behavior creates optimal conditions for capturing high-intent subscribers who demonstrate 40-60% higher open rates and 25-35% better click-through performance in subsequent email campaigns.

These engagement advantages translate to measurable down-funnel improvements: Twitter/X-sourced leads show 20-30% higher sales conversion rates in B2B contexts, 15-25% longer average session durations on linked websites, and 35-45% higher lifetime engagement across owned media channels.

The conversational nature of Twitter/X enables real-time customer service and community building that drives long-term retention rates 18-28% above TikTok-equivalent customer acquisition channels.

Where does TikTok clearly outperform Twitter/X on bottom-of-funnel actions such as add-to-cart rate, first-purchase frequency, and repeat purchase velocity?

TikTok dominates bottom-funnel e-commerce metrics, with add-to-cart rates 10-12% higher than Twitter/X, first-purchase frequency advantages of 8-10%, and repeat purchase velocity outpacing Twitter/X by 10-15%.

Add-to-cart performance on TikTok benefits from the platform's visual product demonstration capabilities and integrated shopping features. Users who engage with TikTok ads show 3.2-4.8% add-to-cart rates compared to Twitter/X's 2.1-3.4%, with the gap widening to 6-8 percentage points for fashion and beauty products where visual appeal drives immediate purchase intent.

First-purchase frequency demonstrates TikTok's impulse-buying advantages, with 55% of users reporting impulse purchases compared to Twitter/X's 43%. The platform's algorithm optimization for conversion events and seamless in-app purchasing experience reduce friction between product discovery and transaction completion. Average time from first ad exposure to purchase drops to 2.3 days on TikTok versus 4.7 days on Twitter/X for equivalent product categories.

Repeat purchase velocity shows TikTok's strongest advantage in building customer habits, with 68% of first-time buyers making second purchases within 30 days compared to Twitter/X's 52%. This performance stems from TikTok's ability to retarget users with personalized product recommendations and creator-driven social proof that maintains engagement beyond initial conversion events.

The velocity advantages compound over time: TikTok-acquired customers generate 25-40% more total purchase events in their first 90 days, making up for potentially lower individual transaction values through increased purchase frequency.

If your engagement feels flat, we've mapped all the formats that get traction.

How have CPM, CAC, and key conversion-rate figures for both platforms trended quarter-by-quarter throughout 2025?

2025 has shown divergent cost trends, with TikTok's CPMs decreasing 5-10% quarter-over-quarter while Twitter/X costs increased 8-12% following major platform changes and inventory shifts.

Q1 2025 marked a turning point: TikTok's expanded inventory through global rollout of new ad formats and optimized oCPM bidding drove costs down, while Twitter/X's introduction of "Conversation Ads" and premium inventory positioning pushed CPMs higher. TikTok's average CPM dropped from $6.8 in Q4 2024 to $6.2 by Q2 2025, while Twitter/X rose from $5.9 to $6.5 over the same period.

Customer acquisition costs followed similar patterns, with TikTok showing 5-8% CAC improvements due to algorithm refinements and expanded targeting options. Twitter/X experienced 10-15% CAC increases as the platform prioritized engagement quality over reach, leading to higher costs but improved conversion rates for remaining advertisers.

Conversion rate trends diverged by vertical: TikTok's rates improved 2-4% in e-commerce categories while declining slightly in B2B segments. Twitter/X maintained stable conversion performance across most verticals but showed particular strength in professional services and subscription-based offerings.

Seasonal analysis reveals TikTok's costs following traditional patterns with Q4 peaks, while Twitter/X showed unusual stability during holiday periods, suggesting advertiser uncertainty following platform changes moderated demand spikes that typically drive holiday cost increases.

What algorithm changes, ad-inventory shifts, or audience-growth patterns in 2025 most influenced those cost and conversion trends on each platform?

TikTok's implementation of enhanced oCPM optimization and video-first algorithm changes drove the most significant performance shifts, while Twitter/X's "Conversation Ads" rollout and premium inventory restructuring reshaped its advertising landscape.

TikTok's oCPM optimization update in Q1 2025 fundamentally changed how the platform targets likely converters, focusing ad delivery on users with higher purchase probability rather than broad engagement metrics. This shift reduced overall CAC by 5-8% while improving conversion quality, though it initially caused delivery fluctuations as algorithms learned new targeting parameters.

The platform's new video-first algorithm prioritized 2- and 6-second view optimization, introducing CPV bidding options that boosted starter-funnel metrics but increased CAC by 10-15% for conversion campaigns as competition intensified for high-intent users. TikTok's expansion of deep-link ad personalization and enhanced commerce features positioned the platform for stronger bottom-funnel performance heading into 2026.

Twitter/X's "Conversation Ads" rollout created premium inventory commanding 15-20% higher CPMs but delivering improved engagement depth and lead quality. The platform's shift toward video content and vertical ad formats helped early adopters achieve 14% lower costs while maintaining reach, though overall inventory constraints pushed baseline costs higher.

Audience growth patterns showed TikTok adding younger demographics in secondary markets while Twitter/X focused on professional user retention, creating distinct targeting opportunities that influenced campaign performance and cost structures across both platforms.

Based on current beta features, policy roadmaps, and early advertiser data, what shifts in CAC and funnel performance should marketers realistically plan for on Twitter/X and TikTok in 2026?

2026 projections indicate continued cost advantages for TikTok with ±10% CAC fluctuations as deep-link personalization matures, while Twitter/X's expanded "Conversations +" ad units and professional targeting enhancements should stabilize costs and improve B2B conversion performance.

TikTok's roadmap emphasizes enhanced commerce integration and AI-driven creative optimization that should reduce CAC by an additional 3-7% for e-commerce brands while potentially increasing costs for service-based businesses as competition intensifies. Beta testing of advanced retargeting capabilities shows promise for improving customer lifetime value through more sophisticated funnel optimization.

Twitter/X's focus on professional communities and newsletter integration positions the platform for 8-15% improvements in lead generation efficiency, though overall CAC may remain stable as the platform balances reach with engagement quality. The "Conversations +" expansion should provide more granular targeting options that benefit B2B advertisers while potentially increasing costs in competitive professional verticals.

Both platforms are investing heavily in cross-device tracking improvements and privacy-compliant attribution modeling that should enhance conversion measurement accuracy by 12-20%, enabling more precise CAC optimization regardless of absolute cost changes.

Marketers should plan for increased emphasis on creative quality and platform-native content, with algorithm changes favoring authentic, engaging creative over traditional advertising approaches. Budget allocation strategies should account for TikTok's continued growth in e-commerce functionality while leveraging Twitter/X's strengthening position in professional and subscription-based customer acquisition.

Still struggling to grow? We mapped hundreds of accounts that cracked the code.

Conclusion

Sources

1. Gupta Media Social CPM Tracker
2. inBeat Agency TikTok Statistics
3. LoyaltyLion Average CAC Ecommerce
4. Business of Apps TikTok Ads Cost
5. Shopify Customer Acquisition Cost by Industry
6. Marin Software TikTok Customer Acquisition
7. ClickGuard Customer Acquisition Cost Digital Marketing
8. Business of Apps User Acquisition Costs
9. AdNabu TikTok Ads Cost
10. Lebesgue TikTok Ads Benchmarks
11. Venturz Social Media Advertising Cost
12. TrackBee TikTok Ads Cost 2025
13. Keywords Everywhere TikTok Advertising Stats
14. Spiralytics X Twitter Ads Statistics
15. Brafton Social Advertising Benchmarks
16. WebFX Cost to Advertise on Twitter
17. Business of Apps CPC Rates
18. NuOptima Twitter Ads Cost