Today, do you get a better conversion rate on Twitter/X or on Linkedin?

This blog post has been written by the person who has mapped all the strategies and examples in our cheatsheets

LinkedIn's visitor-to-lead conversion rate of 2.74% dramatically outperforms X/Twitter's 0.69% rate—a 277% advantage that reshapes B2B marketing strategy. The average LinkedIn ad conversion rate hits 6.1%, while X/Twitter struggles with engagement rates below 0.15%, making platform choice critical for 2025 growth.

And if you need to fast-track your growth on X, check all our cheatsheets.

What are the current average profile-visit-to-conversion rates on X/Twitter versus LinkedIn across all sectors?

LinkedIn dominates with a 2.74% visitor-to-lead conversion rate compared to X/Twitter's 0.69%, representing a 277% performance advantage across 5,000+ businesses analyzed.

HubSpot's comprehensive study reveals that LinkedIn traffic converts to leads at nearly three times the rate of X/Twitter traffic. This massive difference stems from LinkedIn's professional context where users actively seek business solutions versus X/Twitter's entertainment-focused environment.

The sample size includes over 5,000 businesses across multiple industries, making this the most reliable benchmark available. LinkedIn's conversion rate also exceeds the social media channel average of 0.98%, while X/Twitter falls below this baseline. These numbers reflect actual business outcomes rather than vanity metrics, measuring genuine lead generation from social traffic.

For B2B companies specifically, LinkedIn's advantage becomes even more pronounced. The platform's professional user base and intent-driven behavior create an environment where conversion rates consistently outperform other social channels.

Not sure what content to post? We've already collected what works in our cheatsheets.

How do these averages vary by niche and which platform wins each segment?

B2B SaaS sees LinkedIn conversion rates of 2-5% versus X/Twitter's 0.5-1.5%, while consumer e-commerce performs better on X/Twitter due to impulse buying behavior and visual content virality.

B2B segments consistently favor LinkedIn due to its professional environment and decision-maker concentration. The platform excels in complex sales cycles where relationship-building and credibility matter most. Professional services see the highest conversion rates on LinkedIn, often reaching 7% for specialized consulting firms.

Consumer-focused businesses perform better on X/Twitter, particularly those selling digital products under $100. The platform's real-time nature and viral potential create opportunities for impulse purchases and rapid audience growth. Creator economy businesses leverage X/Twitter's engagement features to build communities that convert into paid products.

What are the key demographic differences between platforms and their conversion impact?

LinkedIn's 56.9% male user base aged 25-34 with decision-making authority converts at rates 2-3x higher than X/Twitter's younger, more diverse audience that prioritizes entertainment over professional content.

LinkedIn demographics skew heavily toward professionals with purchasing power. The platform's user base includes 63 million decision-makers and maintains the highest concentration of C-level executives across social media. This demographic composition directly impacts conversion rates, as LinkedIn users actively seek business solutions and have budget authority.

X/Twitter's demographic spread favors Gen Z (the largest growing segment) and entertainment-focused content consumption. While this creates lower B2B conversion rates, it offers advantages for consumer brands targeting younger demographics. The platform's real-time nature appeals to users seeking immediate information and quick interactions rather than considered B2B purchases.

Geographic differences also matter. LinkedIn shows stronger performance in North American and European markets where professional networking culture is established. X/Twitter maintains more global appeal but with varying conversion rates by region, particularly in emerging markets where mobile-first consumption dominates.

Income levels correlate directly with platform preference and conversion behavior. LinkedIn users report higher average incomes and represent decision-making roles within organizations, while X/Twitter's broader user base includes more varied economic segments with different purchasing priorities.

What are the median metrics for accounts under 10,000 followers?

Smaller accounts on LinkedIn achieve 0.44% click-through rates with $150-300 required ad spend for statistical significance, while X/Twitter accounts see 0.86% CTR but need $500-1,000 spend to reach meaningful conversion data.

Small LinkedIn accounts benefit from the platform's professional context even without large followings. Engagement rates of 0.70-1.5% remain achievable for accounts under 10K followers when posting industry-relevant content consistently. The key advantage lies in LinkedIn's algorithm favoring quality engagement over follower count, allowing smaller accounts to reach decision-makers effectively.

X/Twitter's higher click-through rates for small accounts reflect the platform's discovery-friendly algorithm, but conversion quality often lags behind LinkedIn. The rapid-fire nature of X/Twitter content requires more frequent posting and higher ad spend to maintain visibility. Small accounts typically need 3-5x more content volume to achieve similar reach as LinkedIn.

Opt-in rates vary significantly by offer type. LinkedIn sees 2-5% opt-in rates for small accounts offering professional content like whitepapers or webinars. X/Twitter performs better with casual opt-ins like newsletters or updates, achieving 3-7% rates but with lower long-term value.

The statistical significance threshold reflects platform costs and audience behavior. LinkedIn's higher CPM means smaller accounts need concentrated spend over shorter periods, while X/Twitter's lower costs allow for longer testing periods with smaller daily budgets.

How do mid-tier accounts (10K-100K followers) compare in cost per acquisition?

LinkedIn's average cost per acquisition ranges from $500-2,000 for mid-tier accounts, while X/Twitter achieves $50-300 CPA, but LinkedIn delivers 2-3x higher customer lifetime value offsetting the initial cost difference.

Mid-tier LinkedIn accounts benefit from established credibility and can command premium pricing for their offerings. The higher CPA reflects both platform costs and the complex B2B sales cycles common on LinkedIn. However, the quality of acquisitions justifies the investment—LinkedIn-sourced customers typically show 40-60% higher retention rates and larger deal sizes.

X/Twitter's lower acquisition costs come with trade-offs in customer quality and lifetime value. The platform excels for high-volume, lower-value acquisitions where quick conversion cycles matter more than relationship depth. Mid-tier accounts often use X/Twitter for top-of-funnel awareness before moving prospects to higher-converting channels.

Content format performance varies dramatically between platforms for mid-tier accounts. LinkedIn video content drives 38% higher click-through rates for accounts in this range, while X/Twitter video performs best for entertainment and consumer-focused content. Single image posts remain the most cost-effective format on LinkedIn for B2B messaging.

The optimal strategy involves platform-specific content approaches. LinkedIn rewards longer-form, thought leadership content that builds authority over time. X/Twitter favors rapid-fire, trend-based content that captures immediate attention and drives quick actions.

Don't waste time guessing what converts. Steal all the proven strategies instead.

What performance metrics do large accounts (100K+ followers) achieve?

Enterprise-level accounts report LinkedIn conversion rates of 1.5-3% with revenue per follower of $2-8, while X/Twitter accounts see 0.3-0.8% conversion rates but generate $0.50-2 per follower due to broader reach and viral potential.

Large LinkedIn accounts leverage brand authority to achieve consistently higher conversion rates despite having massive audiences. The professional context creates trust that translates directly into higher-value conversions. Enterprise accounts often see 50-75% of their LinkedIn revenue come from existing network connections rather than cold prospects.

X/Twitter's large accounts benefit from algorithmic amplification and viral potential but face challenges converting broad reach into qualified leads. The platform's entertainment focus means even business accounts must balance professional content with engaging, shareable material to maintain audience growth.

Brand authority impacts platform performance differently. On LinkedIn, established brands see minimal follower count impact on conversion rates—a 500K follower account may convert similarly to a 50K account if content quality remains high. X/Twitter shows more direct correlation between follower count and reach, but conversion quality doesn't scale proportionally.

Revenue per follower metrics reveal platform strengths. LinkedIn's higher per-follower revenue reflects the professional user base's purchasing power and business intent. X/Twitter's lower per-follower revenue is offset by easier audience growth and broader reach potential, making it valuable for scale-focused strategies.

Which revenue streams perform best on each platform?

LinkedIn dominates high-ticket services (15-25% conversion rates) and B2B product sales, while X/Twitter excels in affiliate marketing (5-12% conversion rates), sponsorships, and creator monetization models.

• High-ticket services ($5K+): LinkedIn achieves 15-25% conversion rates due to professional trust and decision-maker presence, while X/Twitter struggles at 2-5% for similar offerings
• B2B software sales: LinkedIn drives 2-5% conversion rates with longer sales cycles, compared to X/Twitter's 0.5-1.5% rate but faster initial engagement
• Affiliate marketing: X/Twitter leads with 5-12% conversion rates for consumer products, while LinkedIn manages 1-3% for professional tools and services
• Digital courses/info-products: Creator-focused content performs better on X/Twitter (8-15% conversion) versus LinkedIn's authority-based approach (3-8%)
• Sponsorship deals: X/Twitter's engagement-driven model generates 2-4x higher sponsorship values per follower, while LinkedIn offers more targeted but smaller-scale opportunities

Professional services see the highest conversion rates on LinkedIn, particularly consulting, legal, and financial services where trust and credibility drive purchasing decisions. The platform's professional context naturally aligns with high-value service offerings that require relationship-building and expertise demonstration.

Gated communities and membership sites perform differently across platforms. LinkedIn's professional focus supports industry-specific communities with higher price points ($200-1,000/month), while X/Twitter favors broader interest communities with lower entry costs ($10-100/month) but larger potential audiences.

What are the complete funnel benchmarks for 2025?

LinkedIn's full funnel shows 2.74% impression-to-click, 45-65% click-to-landing-page-view, 15-25% landing-page-view-to-lead, and 2-8% lead-to-customer conversion, while X/Twitter achieves higher top-funnel engagement but lower bottom-funnel conversion.

The funnel performance differences reflect each platform's user intent and behavior patterns. LinkedIn users demonstrate higher commercial intent throughout the funnel, leading to better progression rates at each stage despite lower initial click-through rates.

X/Twitter's strength lies in top-funnel awareness and initial engagement, making it valuable for building audiences that can be retargeted on other platforms. The platform's real-time nature creates opportunities for rapid engagement but struggles with the consideration phases typical in B2B sales.

Where does X/Twitter definitively outperform LinkedIn?

X/Twitter delivers 32% higher click-through rates (0.86% vs 0.65%), 60% lower cost per click ($2.50 vs $6.50), and 300% faster conversion cycles (7-30 days vs 45-90 days), making it superior for rapid-cycle, volume-based campaigns.

The platform's real-time nature excels in trend-jacking and viral marketing campaigns. Brands can achieve 10-50x organic reach during trending events, something LinkedIn's professional environment doesn't support. This makes X/Twitter unbeatable for time-sensitive promotions and cultural moment marketing.

Content discovery favors X/Twitter significantly. The platform's algorithm promotes engaging content regardless of follower count, allowing small accounts to achieve massive reach. LinkedIn's professional filter limits discovery potential, making it harder for new accounts to gain traction without existing network connections.

Customer service and real-time engagement showcase X/Twitter's unique strengths. Brands report 40-60% faster response expectations on X/Twitter, creating opportunities for immediate problem resolution and relationship building. The public nature of these interactions builds brand transparency in ways LinkedIn's more formal environment cannot match.

If your engagement feels flat, we've mapped all the formats that get traction.

Where does LinkedIn consistently beat X/Twitter?

LinkedIn dominates in average order value ($2,500-15,000 vs $50-500), lead quality scores (85% decision-makers vs 25%), and enterprise customer acquisition where professional credibility drives 5-10x higher conversion rates than X/Twitter.

The platform's professional context creates unmatched conditions for B2B relationship building. LinkedIn-sourced leads show 60-80% higher meeting acceptance rates and 40% shorter sales cycles once engaged, reflecting the professional intent that drives platform usage.

Content longevity strongly favors LinkedIn, where professional posts maintain engagement for weeks or months versus X/Twitter's hour-to-day lifespan. This extended content life allows for compounding returns on content investment and builds long-term authority that translates into ongoing lead generation.

Enterprise sales environments heavily favor LinkedIn's formal professional setting. Complex B2B sales requiring multiple stakeholder buy-in see 3-5x higher success rates when initiated through LinkedIn connections versus X/Twitter outreach. The platform's professional credibility signals reduce friction in high-value sales processes.

Account-based marketing campaigns perform dramatically better on LinkedIn due to precise targeting capabilities and professional context. B2B companies report 40-70% higher engagement rates when targeting specific companies or roles through LinkedIn versus X/Twitter's broader demographic targeting options.

How have these metrics shifted from 2024 to 2025?

LinkedIn's conversion rates improved 15-25% year-over-year as professional intent increased, while X/Twitter saw 10-20% engagement rate declines but maintained click-through rate performance, creating clearer platform differentiation.

LinkedIn's improvements stem from enhanced targeting capabilities and increased professional platform usage post-pandemic. The platform's introduction of conversation ads achieved 50% open rates and 12% click-through rates, significantly above previous benchmarks. Video content performance increased 40% year-over-year as professional users embraced multimedia content.

X/Twitter faced challenges with engagement rate drops from 0.18% to 0.15% as algorithm changes prioritized verified accounts and reduced organic reach for business profiles. However, the platform maintained competitive click-through rates and introduced new advertising features that improved conversion tracking capabilities.

B2B SaaS companies specifically reported 20-30% improvement in LinkedIn lead quality scores, while X/Twitter maintained its advantage in top-funnel awareness metrics. The growing professionalization of remote work culture strengthened LinkedIn's position for B2B marketing throughout 2024-2025.

Cost changes favored X/Twitter with 15-25% CPC reductions as advertiser competition decreased, while LinkedIn costs remained stable but with improved ROI due to better conversion rates. This created a more defined value proposition for each platform based on campaign objectives.

What should you budget for each platform in 2026?

LinkedIn costs will likely increase 10-15% with conversion rates stabilizing at current levels, while X/Twitter may see 20-30% cost reductions with improved targeting features, making budget allocation strategy-dependent rather than platform-superior.

LinkedIn's premium positioning will drive continued cost increases as demand for professional audience targeting grows. B2B companies should budget $8-12 CPC for competitive keywords and $150-400 CPL for quality leads. The platform's focus on professional content and AI-enhanced targeting will justify premium pricing through improved ROI.

X/Twitter's repositioning under new ownership creates pricing uncertainty but early indicators suggest more competitive rates to win back advertiser confidence. Budget projections show $1.50-4.00 CPC ranges with improved conversion tracking that may boost overall campaign performance despite lower conversion rates.

Optimization tactics for 2026 should focus on platform-specific strengths. LinkedIn campaigns should emphasize thought leadership content, employee advocacy, and account-based marketing approaches. X/Twitter strategies should leverage real-time engagement, trend participation, and rapid-cycle testing for optimal performance.

The highest ROI approach involves integrated strategies where X/Twitter drives top-funnel awareness and LinkedIn handles mid-to-bottom funnel conversion. This combination allows brands to leverage each platform's strengths while minimizing individual platform limitations.

Still struggling to grow? We mapped hundreds of accounts that cracked the code.

Conclusion

Sources

1. TheB2BHouse - LinkedIn Ad Benchmarks 2025
2. Brafton - Social Advertising Benchmarks for 2025
3. WebFX - LinkedIn Statistics Marketers Should Know
4. Sprout Social - LinkedIn Statistics for Marketers in 2025
5. Hootsuite - Average Engagement Rates for 12 Industries
6. Social Insider - Social Media Benchmarks For 2025
7. HubSpot - LinkedIn 277% More Effective for Lead Generation
8. Sprinklr - LinkedIn Benchmarks Brands Should Follow
9. WebFX - LinkedIn Conversion Rate Guide
10. Huble - LinkedIn Ads Benchmarks for 2025
11. Spiralytics - X Twitter Advertising Stats & Benchmarks
12. Social Status - X Twitter Engagement Rate Benchmark
13. Rival IQ - 2025 Social Media Industry Benchmark Report
14. Hootsuite - X Twitter Stats Marketers Need to Know
15. Callin - B2B SaaS Marketing Benchmarks 2025
16. HockeyStack - LinkedIn Ads Benchmark Report for B2B
17. First Page Sage - Average SaaS Conversion Rates 2025
18. Powered by Search - B2B SaaS Funnel Conversion Benchmarks