Today, do you get a better engagement rate on Twitter/X or on Instagram?

This blog post has been written by the person who has mapped all the strategies and examples in our cheatsheets

Instagram consistently outperforms Twitter/X in engagement rates across all follower tiers, with nano-influencers achieving 3.45-3.65% engagement compared to Twitter/X's 3.47-3.60% for similar accounts.

However, Twitter/X maintains significant advantages in B2B visibility, virality potential, and real-time engagement that make platform choice heavily dependent on your specific goals and content format strengths. The engagement landscape shifted dramatically throughout 2024-2025, with Twitter/X experiencing a 48% year-over-year decline in engagement while Instagram's rates remained more stable despite algorithm changes prioritizing views over traditional engagement metrics.

And if you need to fast-track your growth on X, check all our cheatsheets.

Summary

Instagram dominates visual storytelling and conversion rates while Twitter/X excels in virality and professional networking, with engagement rates varying significantly by follower count and content niche.

Metric Twitter/X Performance Instagram Performance
Under 10K Followers Engagement 3.47-3.60% average rate, 31-47 likes per post 3.45-3.65% average rate, higher interaction volume
10K-100K Followers Engagement 2.5-3% engagement rate decline 3.04-3.12% stable engagement maintenance
100K+ Followers Engagement 1.77-2.15% significant drop-off 1.77-2.37% better retention at scale
Conversion Rates Lower overall, 61% click fraud impact 1-2% average, 0.5-3.5% for catalog sales
Content Format Winners Threaded content, media-rich posts Carousels (12% higher rates), Reels (36% more reach)
Link Performance 2.5-second throttling, reduced visibility Higher click-through rates, less suppression
Daily Usage Time 30-34 minutes average 33.1 minutes average (53 for Gen Z)

Steal What Works on 𝕏

Thousands of people have already tested what works.
Everything has been captured, mapped, and turned into cheat codes.
Grab them now.

GET THE CHEATSHEETS

How many likes and comments does the average post get on Twitter/X versus Instagram for different follower tiers?

Instagram demonstrates superior engagement volume across all follower segments, with the platform's visual-first approach driving more meaningful interactions per post.

Follower Range Twitter/X Performance Instagram Performance
Under 10K Followers 31-47 likes per post, 3-4 comments average, 3.47-3.60% engagement rate Higher interaction volume per post, 3.45-3.65% engagement rate with stronger comment engagement
10K-100K Followers Similar like counts but engagement rate drops to 2.5-3% range Maintains 3.04-3.12% engagement rates with consistent interaction patterns
100K-500K Followers 1.77-2.15% engagement rate with diminishing returns on follower growth 1.77-2.37% engagement rate, better performance retention at scale
500K+ Followers Further decline in engagement rates, below 1.5% commonly observed Maintains slightly higher rates due to algorithmic favorability for visual content
Engagement Quality More text-based discussions, shorter interaction lifespan Visual engagement drives longer interaction periods and saves
Peak Interaction Times Real-time during trending events and news cycles Consistent throughout day with evening peaks for lifestyle content
Comment Depth Shorter responses, rapid-fire conversations Longer, more thoughtful comments and emoji-heavy interactions

What are the average engagement rates across key niches like fashion, tech, fitness, and education?

Instagram dominates fashion and fitness niches while Twitter/X maintains advantages in tech and education through its discussion-focused format.

Fashion and beauty brands achieve 2.00-2.37% engagement rates on Instagram, significantly outperforming Twitter/X where visual content struggles against the platform's text-centric algorithm. Fitness content particularly thrives on Instagram due to the platform's visual storytelling capabilities and dedicated fitness communities that drive consistent interaction patterns.

Tech and education content shows more balanced performance, with Twitter/X excelling in real-time discussions and thought leadership while Instagram captures audiences through infographic-style educational posts and behind-the-scenes tech content. The overall platform averages have declined to 0.50-0.70% on Instagram in 2025, while Twitter/X experienced a more dramatic 48% year-over-year engagement decline.

B2B and tech discussions maintain higher engagement on Twitter/X due to the platform's real-time conversation format and professional networking capabilities. Educational threads and thought leadership content perform exceptionally well, often achieving above-average engagement rates when targeting industry-specific audiences.

Not sure what content to post? We've already collected what works in our cheatsheets.

What are the average conversion rates when promoting products or services on each platform?

Instagram significantly outperforms Twitter/X in conversion metrics, with 1-2% average conversion rates compared to Twitter/X's lower performance heavily impacted by a 61% click fraud rate.

Instagram's conversion performance breaks down into specific objectives: lead generation achieves 0.5-3.0% conversion rates, catalog sales reach 0.5-3.5%, and direct conversions range from 0-3.0%. The platform's visual nature and integrated shopping features create a more seamless path from discovery to purchase, particularly for lifestyle and consumer goods.

Affiliate marketing on Instagram shows strong performance through established influencer partnerships that drive consistent sales, with authentic product integrations achieving higher conversion rates than traditional advertising approaches. The platform's Story features and swipe-up capabilities (for eligible accounts) create multiple touchpoints throughout the customer journey.

Twitter/X conversion rates suffer from the platform's 61% click fraud rate, which significantly impacts actual conversion quality and ROI measurement. However, B2B lead generation and subscription-based models can see better performance due to the platform's professional networking capabilities and real-time engagement patterns that build trust through ongoing conversations.

The platform's strength lies in driving awareness and consideration rather than direct conversions, with many brands using Twitter/X for thought leadership and community building while directing conversions through other channels.

How does engagement behavior differ between Twitter/X and Instagram audiences regarding content formats?

Instagram audiences respond best to carousels and Reels while Twitter/X users engage most with threaded content and media-rich posts that spark real-time discussions.

On Instagram, carousels lead engagement with 12% higher rates than other formats and 1.92% higher average engagement overall. This format allows brands to tell comprehensive stories while encouraging users to swipe through multiple images or graphics. Reels achieve 36% more reach than other post types but generate lower engagement rates than carousels, making them ideal for discovery rather than deep engagement.

Single images significantly underperform on Instagram with the lowest reach and engagement metrics, as the platform's algorithm increasingly favors interactive and multi-media content formats. Stories maintain high engagement for real-time updates and behind-the-scenes content, though these metrics aren't included in feed engagement calculations.

Twitter/X users engage most with threaded content that allows for in-depth discussions and educational material breakdown. These threads often achieve viral potential when they provide valuable insights or unique perspectives on trending topics. Media-rich posts (video, images, GIFs) receive 25% more engagement than text-only posts, but the text component remains crucial for sparking conversations.

Real-time commentary excels during trending events and news cycles, where Twitter/X's immediacy advantage becomes most apparent. Users expect quick, timely responses and often engage in rapid-fire conversations that can trend for hours.

Don't reinvent
the wheel

There are proven patterns that work. Proven formats. Proven hooks.
Everything has been captured, mapped, and turned into cheat codes.

GET THE CHEATSHEETS

Which platform shows consistently better performance in link clicks and traffic redirection?

Instagram demonstrates superior link performance due to less aggressive link suppression, while Twitter/X actively throttles external links with 2.5-second delays and reduced algorithmic visibility.

Twitter/X's link throttling policy adds significant delays to competitor platform links and reduces organic reach for posts containing external URLs. The platform prioritizes content that keeps users engaged on-platform, meaning posts with external links receive dramatically reduced algorithmic visibility compared to native content.

This suppression particularly impacts content creators and businesses relying on traffic redirection to external websites, newsletters, or e-commerce platforms. Many successful Twitter/X accounts have adapted by using link-in-bio strategies or directing users to find links in their profiles rather than including them directly in posts.

Instagram restricts external links in captions but allows them in Stories (for accounts with 10K+ followers or verified status) and bio sections. Click-through rates remain higher on Instagram due to less aggressive link suppression, and the platform's visual nature often provides better context for why users should click through to external content.

The platform's shopping integration allows for native product links that don't face the same suppression as external links, creating better conversion pathways for e-commerce businesses. Stories provide an effective middle ground for link sharing without impacting feed post performance.

What's the average rate of bot or fake traffic on Twitter/X versus Instagram?

Twitter/X suffers from a 61% click fraud rate while Instagram maintains less than 1% click fraud for advertising, representing a massive quality difference in traffic and engagement authenticity.

The 61% click fraud rate on Twitter/X significantly impacts advertising ROI and makes performance measurement challenging for businesses investing in paid promotion. This high bot activity affects both organic engagement metrics and paid advertising results, making it difficult to distinguish genuine audience interest from automated interactions.

Instagram's sub-1% click fraud rate for advertising creates a more reliable environment for conversion tracking and ROI measurement. While organic engagement may still include some bot activity, the platform's visual verification requirements and advanced detection systems maintain higher traffic quality.

Accounts experiencing rapid growth or using aggressive paid promotion strategies on both platforms should monitor engagement quality indicators like comment relevance, profile completeness of interacting accounts, and geographic distribution of engagement to identify potential bot activity.

If your engagement feels flat, we've mapped all the formats that get traction.

How much time do users spend daily on each platform and how has this changed?

Instagram users spend 33.1 minutes daily on average (53 minutes for Gen Z) while Twitter/X users spend 30-34 minutes daily, with both platforms maintaining relatively stable usage patterns through 2024-2025.

Instagram's higher usage time reflects the platform's diverse content formats and algorithm's ability to maintain user attention through varied visual content. Gen Z users particularly drive up Instagram's average with 53-minute daily sessions, indicating the platform's strength in capturing younger demographics who consume content across Reels, Stories, and feed posts.

Twitter/X's 30-34 minute daily usage has remained stable despite the platform's declining engagement rates, suggesting users maintain habits around news consumption and real-time discussions even as they interact less frequently with content. The platform benefits from being a primary source for breaking news and trending topic discussions.

Usage patterns show Instagram users engage in longer, more immersive sessions while Twitter/X users often check in multiple times throughout the day for shorter bursts, particularly during news events or trending moments. This difference impacts content strategy, with Instagram favoring evergreen visual content and Twitter/X requiring more timely, reactive posting.

Fast-Track Your Growth on 𝕏

You don't need to test everything and waste time.
Fast-track your growth by downloading what already works.

GET THE CHEATSHEETS

How did engagement rates evolve throughout 2024 and into 2025 with algorithm changes?

Twitter/X experienced a dramatic 48% year-over-year engagement decline while Instagram maintained more stable rates despite shifting to views-focused analytics and implementing AI-powered personalization improvements.

Instagram's algorithm updates in 2024 prioritized views over traditional engagement metrics, announced a focus on original content boost for smaller creators, and implemented reduced organic reach for external link content. These changes aimed to surface more authentic, original content while improving AI-powered personalization to maintain user engagement despite the broader social media engagement decline.

The platform's shift toward views as a primary metric reflects broader industry trends toward video consumption and time-spent metrics rather than traditional likes and comments. This change particularly benefited Reels creators and accounts producing original visual content while challenging those relying heavily on curated or reposted material.

Twitter/X's algorithm changes included premium subscriber prioritization for visibility, more aggressive external link suppression, maintained emphasis on real-time trends, and engagement velocity as a key ranking factor. These changes, combined with broader platform instability, contributed to the significant engagement decline.

The platform's focus on premium subscribers created a two-tiered system where paying users receive algorithmic advantages, while free users experience reduced organic reach. This shift fundamentally altered the platform's engagement dynamics and contributed to creator migration to other platforms.

What changes are expected for both platforms in 2026?

Both platforms are expected to further prioritize video content and AI-driven personalization, with Instagram likely expanding shopping integration and Twitter/X potentially implementing more premium-gated features.

Instagram's 2026 trajectory includes expanded augmented reality features, deeper integration with Meta's broader ecosystem, enhanced creator monetization tools, and continued emphasis on video-first content discovery. The platform will likely introduce more sophisticated shopping experiences and AI-powered content creation tools.

Expected developments include improved AR filters for product try-ons, expanded live commerce capabilities, and enhanced analytics for creators. The platform may also introduce new content formats that blend traditional posts with interactive elements to maintain engagement as competition from TikTok and other video platforms intensifies.

Twitter/X's future depends heavily on platform stability and user retention, with potential developments including expanded subscription tiers, enhanced video capabilities, and new monetization options for creators. The platform may introduce more community-focused features and improved content discovery mechanisms.

Both platforms will likely face increased regulation around algorithm transparency and data privacy, potentially affecting how content is distributed and how engagement metrics are calculated and reported to users and advertisers.

What does the complete conversion funnel look like on each platform?

Instagram's conversion funnel flows from reach through impressions, engagement, clicks, saves, shares to conversions with major drop-offs at the click-to-conversion stage, while Twitter/X suffers significant quality loss at the click stage due to bot traffic.

Funnel Stage Instagram Performance Twitter/X Performance
Reach Strong organic reach for original visual content, algorithm favors engagement Limited organic reach, premium subscribers receive priority
Impressions High impression rates for carousels and Reels, consistent visibility Impression quality varies greatly, trending content gets massive boost
Engagement 3.45-3.65% for nano-influencers, steady across follower tiers 3.47-3.60% for smaller accounts, 48% annual decline overall
Clicks Higher click-through rates, less link suppression impact 61% click fraud rate severely impacts quality measurement
Saves/Shares Strong save rates for informational content, shares drive discovery Retweets and quotes provide viral potential, lower save functionality
Conversions 1-2% average conversion rate, strong for visual products Lower conversion rates, better for B2B lead generation
Major Drop-offs Largest drop from engagement to click, then click to conversion Significant quality loss at click stage due to bot traffic

Where does Twitter/X clearly outperform Instagram?

Twitter/X dominates in virality potential, B2B visibility, real-time engagement, and thread-based educational content where its conversation-focused format creates unique advantages.

  • Virality without follower base: Content can achieve massive reach organically without requiring existing follower counts, allowing unknown accounts to trend globally through engagement velocity and timing
  • B2B thought leadership: Superior platform for professional networking, industry discussions, and establishing expertise through consistent valuable commentary and thread creation
  • Real-time news consumption: Unmatched for breaking news, live event commentary, and trending topic discussions where immediacy creates competitive advantage
  • Thread-based education: Long-form educational content performs exceptionally well, allowing for detailed explanations and step-by-step processes that build authority
  • Professional networking: Direct access to industry leaders, journalists, and decision-makers creates opportunities unavailable on other platforms

Don't waste time guessing what converts. Steal all the proven strategies instead.

Where does Instagram clearly outperform Twitter/X?

Instagram excels in product showcasing, visual storytelling, influencer marketing, and e-commerce integration where its visual-first approach drives superior conversion rates and brand affinity.

  • Product showcasing: Visual format ideal for demonstrating products, lifestyle integration, and aesthetic presentation that drives purchase decisions
  • Influencer partnerships: Higher conversion rates and more authentic partnerships due to visual storytelling capabilities and shopping integration features
  • E-commerce integration: Native shopping features, product tagging, and seamless checkout processes create direct path from discovery to purchase
  • Visual storytelling: Superior for brand narrative development, behind-the-scenes content, and emotional connection building through imagery
  • Younger demographics: Stronger penetration and engagement among 18-34 age groups, particularly Gen Z users who spend 53 minutes daily on platform

How should someone decide which platform to prioritize based on their goals and strengths?

Platform selection depends on your primary objectives, target audience demographics, content format strengths, and conversion goals rather than attempting identical strategies across both channels.

Choose Twitter/X when your focus centers on B2B growth with emphasis on thought leadership, real-time engagement is crucial for your industry, text-based content and discussions represent your strength, news commentary or trending topics are central to your strategy, or professional networking serves as a primary goal. The platform excels for consultants, tech professionals, journalists, and service-based businesses.

Choose Instagram when you offer visual products or represent lifestyle brands, e-commerce integration plays an important role in your strategy, influencer partnerships form part of your marketing approach, younger demographics (18-34) comprise your target audience, or brand storytelling through visual content takes priority. The platform works best for consumer goods, fashion, fitness, food, and visually-driven service businesses.

Most successful brands implement a strategic multi-platform approach, using Twitter/X for thought leadership and real-time engagement while utilizing Instagram for visual storytelling and conversion-focused campaigns. The key lies in understanding each platform's unique strengths and aligning content strategy accordingly rather than attempting identical approaches across both channels.

Consider your content creation capabilities, audience demographics, and conversion requirements when making platform decisions. Twitter/X demands consistent real-time engagement and text-heavy content, while Instagram requires visual content creation and aesthetic consistency.

Still struggling to grow? We mapped hundreds of accounts that cracked the code.

Conclusion

Sources

  1. Cropink X Twitter Statistics
  2. Metricool Twitter Study
  3. Buffer Average Engagement Rate
  4. The Influencer Marketing Factory
  5. PopularPays Instagram Engagement Rate 2025
  6. Athletech News Fitness Brands
  7. Agility PR Fitness Influencer Marketing
  8. Amra & Elma Instagram Statistics
  9. RivalIQ Social Media Benchmark Report
  10. Sprout Social Instagram Stats
  11. Later Affiliate Marketing Instagram
  12. Reddit Meta Ads Click Fraud
  13. Saffron Edge Affiliate Marketing X
  14. Buffer Data Resources
  15. Rapide.ly Carousel Posts Guide
  16. Buffer Instagram Reach Analysis
  17. Immediate Future Links Social Engagement
  18. The Verge X Twitter Links Throttling
  19. Buffer Twitter Algorithm
  20. Dkode Tech Twitter Algorithm Links
  21. Amber90 Social Platforms External Links
  22. Cropink Instagram Time Statistics
  23. Backlinko Instagram Users
Back to blog