What is the average conversion rate from threads on Twitter/X now?
This blog post has been written by the person who has mapped all the strategies and examples in our cheatsheets
Twitter thread conversion rates have become a critical metric for creators looking to monetize their social media presence. While most creators focus on follower count, the real money lies in understanding how threads move people through your conversion funnel.
This comprehensive analysis breaks down every stage of the Twitter thread conversion process, from initial impressions to final conversions, with specific benchmarks for creators with under 10K followers. And if you need to fast-track your growth on X, check all our cheatsheets.
Summary
Twitter threads typically achieve 0.1-0.5% conversion rates from impressions to email subscribers, with most creators seeing significant drop-offs at each funnel stage. Educational threads outperform promotional content, while algorithm changes in 2024 reduced overall engagement by 20%.
| Metric | Typical Range (Under 10K followers) | Performance Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Thread Impressions | 1,000-10,000 per thread | 63% higher than single tweets with links |
| Read Rate | 5-20% of impressions | Depends on hook strength and timing |
| Thread Completion | 10-30% of readers | Last tweet often sees engagement spike |
| Profile Clicks | 1-5% of thread readers | Driven by curiosity and trust signals |
| Bio Link Clicks | 5-15% of profile visitors | Requires clear, relevant CTA |
| Direct Thread CTR | 0.5-2% of viewers | Higher when link placed early |
| Landing Page Conversion | 1-5% of clicks | Varies by offer and alignment |
Steal What Works on 𝕏
Thousands of people have already tested what works.
Everything has been captured, mapped, and turned into cheat codes.
Grab them now.
How many people typically see a tweet when someone with under 10K followers publishes a thread?
Accounts with under 10K followers typically see 1,000-10,000 impressions per thread, with most falling in the 2,000-5,000 range.
The organic reach limitation means only 5-15% of your followers will see any given thread in their feed. Twitter's algorithm prioritizes recent engagement, so threads posted during peak hours (typically 9 AM and 6-9 PM in your audience's timezone) perform significantly better.
Threads consistently outperform single tweets by approximately 63% in terms of impressions, particularly when they generate early engagement signals like replies and retweets. The threading format signals to Twitter's algorithm that this is substantial content worth promoting.
Geographic location and audience activity patterns heavily influence reach. Creators targeting US audiences often see their best performance when posting between 9 AM-12 PM EST and 6-9 PM EST on weekdays.
What percentage of people who see a thread actually stop to read at least part of it?
Industry data suggests that 5-20% of people who see a thread will stop to read at least the opening tweet, with higher-performing threads reaching the upper end of this range.
The first tweet acts as your hook and determines whether readers continue. Threads that start with specific numbers, controversial statements, or clear value propositions consistently achieve higher read rates. Opening with "Here's how I..." or "X things I learned..." typically performs better than generic statements.
Visual elements in the first tweet, including relevant emojis, line breaks for readability, and strategic capitalization, can increase the read rate by 15-25%. The thumbnail preview that appears in feeds plays a crucial role in the initial decision to engage.
Not sure what content to post? We've already collected what works in our cheatsheets.
How many readers reach the end of a 5-10 tweet thread versus those who just scan the first tweet?
Of those who start reading a thread, only 10-30% typically reach the final tweet, with most drop-off occurring after the second or third tweet.
Thread completion rates vary significantly by content type. Educational threads with clear progression (numbered points, step-by-step processes) see completion rates closer to 30%, while storytelling threads often achieve 20-25% completion. Promotional threads typically see the lowest completion rates at 10-15%.
The "1-2-1 rule" explains engagement patterns: high engagement on tweet 1, declining engagement on tweets 2-9, then a spike on the final tweet as committed readers reach the end and are more likely to engage. This final tweet often receives 40-60% of the total thread engagement.
Thread length significantly impacts completion rates. Threads of 5-7 tweets see higher completion rates than 10+ tweet threads, with the optimal length being 6-8 tweets for maximum engagement and completion.
Out of those who read the full thread, how many click on the profile to learn more about the author?
Typically 1-5% of thread readers will click through to the author's profile, with higher rates occurring when the thread establishes clear expertise or authority.
| Thread Type | Profile Click Rate | Key Factors Driving Clicks |
|---|---|---|
| Educational/Tutorial | 3-5% | Demonstrates expertise, provides actionable value, positions author as authority |
| Personal Story | 2-4% | Creates emotional connection, reveals personality, builds relatability |
| Industry Insights | 2-3% | Shows insider knowledge, unique perspective, professional credibility |
| Controversial/Opinion | 1-3% | Sparks curiosity about author's other views, creates debate |
| Promotional | 1-2% | Direct product interest, but lower trust-building |
| News/Commentary | 1-2% | Timeliness, unique angle on current events |
| Resource Compilation | 2-4% | Curator credibility, promise of more valuable resources |
Don't reinvent
the wheel
There are proven patterns that work. Proven formats. Proven hooks.
Everything has been captured, mapped, and turned into cheat codes.
What proportion of profile visitors end up clicking the bio link, assuming the CTA is relevant and clear?
When the call-to-action is relevant and clearly written, 5-15% of profile visitors will click the bio link, with most successful creators achieving 8-12% bio link click rates.
Bio link performance depends heavily on the alignment between thread content and the linked offer. If your thread discusses email marketing strategies and your bio link leads to an email marketing course, click rates can reach 15-20%. Misaligned offers (discussing general business advice but linking to a specific software tool) typically see 2-5% click rates.
The most effective bio CTAs use action-oriented language with specific benefits. "Get my free email course" outperforms "Learn more" by 40-60%. Including urgency or scarcity ("Limited spots available") can increase click rates by an additional 20-30%.
Profile optimization beyond the bio link also impacts click rates. A clear headshot, relevant background image, and pinned tweet that reinforces your value proposition can increase overall profile engagement by 25-35%.
What's the average click-through rate from the thread directly, without going through the profile?
Direct link clicks from threads typically achieve 0.5-2% click-through rates, with performance heavily dependent on link placement and context integration.
Links placed in the final tweet of a thread perform best, achieving CTRs in the 1.5-2% range, while mid-thread links often see 0.5-1% CTRs. The key is ensuring the link feels like a natural continuation of the content rather than an interruption.
Context matters significantly for direct CTRs. Links introduced as "Here's the tool I mentioned" or "Download the free template" perform 2-3x better than generic "Learn more" links. The thread should build anticipation for the linked resource throughout the narrative.
Don't waste time guessing what converts. Steal all the proven strategies instead.
How many people who click through to a landing page from a thread actually convert?
Landing page conversion rates from Twitter threads typically range from 1-5%, with well-optimized funnels achieving rates in the 3-7% range for relevant offers.
The conversion rate depends heavily on the "temperature" of the traffic. Visitors from educational threads that pre-qualify the audience often convert at 4-6%, while those from general awareness threads typically convert at 1-3%. The thread content effectively serves as pre-qualification.
Message match between thread and landing page is crucial. Landing pages that directly reference the thread content or use similar language see conversion rates 40-70% higher than generic pages. Including social proof specific to Twitter (testimonials from other Twitter users) can boost conversions by an additional 20-30%.
Mobile optimization is critical since 70-80% of Twitter thread traffic comes from mobile devices. Landing pages that aren't mobile-optimized can see conversion rates drop by 50-70%.
What's considered a "good" conversion rate from thread impressions to email subscribers, and how has this changed?
A "good" conversion rate from thread impressions to email subscribers currently ranges from 0.1-0.5%, meaning 10-50 new subscribers per 10,000 thread impressions.
This represents a slight decline from 2023 rates of 0.15-0.6%, primarily due to increased competition and the 20% drop in overall engagement rates that occurred throughout 2024. Creators who previously achieved 0.4% conversion rates now typically see 0.3% with the same content quality.
The decline correlates with Twitter's algorithm changes that prioritize engagement velocity over reach. Threads that don't achieve rapid initial engagement (within the first 30-60 minutes) see significantly reduced distribution compared to previous years.
Top performers who maintain 0.4-0.5% conversion rates have adapted by focusing on engagement-driving elements: asking questions, using polls, encouraging specific types of responses, and posting during peak audience activity times.
What are realistic funnel benchmarks for creators with different follower counts?
| Follower Count | Impressions/Thread | Link Clicks | Bio Link Clicks | Conversions/Subscribers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under 1K | 100-1,000 | 5-20 | 1-5 | 1-10 (focus on consistency over volume) |
| 1K-5K | 500-3,000 | 10-60 | 3-15 | 5-30 (establish authority and niche) |
| 5K-10K | 1,000-6,000 | 20-120 | 5-30 | 10-60 (optimize conversion funnel) |
| 10K-25K | 3,000-15,000 | 60-300 | 15-75 | 30-150 (scale successful content) |
| 25K-50K | 8,000-30,000 | 160-600 | 40-150 | 80-300 (diversify monetization) |
| 50K-100K | 15,000-60,000 | 300-1,200 | 75-300 | 150-600 (premium offers viable) |
| 100K+ | 30,000-150,000 | 600-3,000 | 150-750 | 300-1,500 (enterprise opportunities) |
Fast-Track Your Growth on 𝕏
You don't need to test everything and waste time.
Fast-track your growth by downloading what already works.
How does the Twitter conversion funnel compare to Instagram carousels, LinkedIn posts, or TikTok videos?
| Platform | Typical CTR | Conversion Rate | Platform-Specific Advantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Twitter/X Threads | 0.5-2% | 0.1-0.5% | Text-based content, high engagement, niche communities, real-time discussions |
| Instagram Carousels | 1-3% | 0.5-2% | Visual storytelling, higher engagement rates, better for lifestyle/product content |
| LinkedIn Posts | 1-3% | 0.5-2% | Professional context, higher-value B2B conversions, trust factor |
| TikTok Videos | 1-5% | 0.5-3% | Massive reach potential, younger demographics, viral possibilities |
| YouTube Shorts | 2-4% | 1-4% | Video format, longer retention, subscribe-based growth |
| Pinterest Pins | 0.5-1.5% | 1-3% | High purchase intent, longer content lifespan, visual discovery |
| Facebook Posts | 0.3-1% | 0.2-1% | Older demographics, detailed targeting, established ad platform |
What algorithm and UX changes on Twitter in the past 12 months have impacted thread reach and conversion?
The most significant change has been the increased emphasis on engagement velocity, with threads needing to achieve strong initial engagement within 30-60 minutes to receive broader distribution.
Twitter's algorithm now heavily weighs recent engagement signals, particularly replies and quote tweets, over simple likes. This has reduced organic reach for threads that don't immediately spark conversation, contributing to the overall 20% decline in engagement rates throughout 2024.
The introduction of Twitter Blue verification has created a two-tier system where verified accounts receive preferential treatment in feeds and replies. Non-verified accounts have seen their thread reach decline by an estimated 15-25% compared to pre-verification system performance.
UX changes including the expansion of character limits and improved threading interface have made threads more accessible to create, but increased competition has offset potential benefits. The "Show more replies" feature has actually decreased engagement on later tweets in threads.
If your engagement feels flat, we've mapped all the formats that get traction.
How do different types of threads perform in terms of retention and conversion across the full funnel?
Educational threads consistently achieve the highest retention rates at 25-35% completion and conversion rates of 0.3-0.5% from impressions to subscribers.
- Educational/Tutorial Threads: Highest trust-building potential, 25-35% completion rates, 0.3-0.5% conversion rates, excellent for establishing authority and driving long-term subscriber value
- Storytelling Threads: Strong emotional engagement, 20-30% completion rates, 0.2-0.4% conversion rates, best for building personal brand and relatability
- Industry Insights/Analysis: High perceived value, 20-25% completion rates, 0.25-0.4% conversion rates, effective for B2B audiences and professional credibility
- Personal Experience/Lessons: Good engagement, 15-25% completion rates, 0.2-0.35% conversion rates, builds authentic connection with audience
- Promotional/Product Threads: Lower organic reach, 10-20% completion rates, 0.15-0.3% conversion rates, but higher immediate purchase intent
The key differentiator is value density. Threads that provide actionable information in every tweet maintain higher retention than those that build to a single revelation or promotion. Educational threads work best when each tweet could stand alone as valuable content.
Storytelling threads achieve high emotional engagement but require stronger CTAs to convert that engagement into subscribers or customers. The narrative arc should naturally lead to the conversion opportunity rather than feeling like an abrupt sales pitch.
Running out of viral post ideas? We've got hundreds mapped in our cheatsheets, just steal what works.
Conclusion
Understanding Twitter thread conversion rates requires looking beyond vanity metrics to focus on the complete funnel from impression to conversion.
The data shows that while conversion rates may seem low at 0.1-0.5%, consistent thread creation with proper optimization can build substantial email lists and customer bases over time, especially when combined with proven content formats and strategic timing.
Sources
- Buffer Twitter Thread Experiment
- Social Sellinator Twitter Engagement Metrics
- Tweetlio Twitter Threads Best Practices
- Circleboom Tweet Click Analysis
- B2B Rocket Twitter Threads Lead Magnets
- TweetHunter Call to Action Guide
- Catchr Twitter Ads KPI
- Buffer Tweet Click-Through Rate Guide
- Spiralytics Twitter Ads Statistics
- Hootsuite Twitter Algorithm Guide
- Mandala System Twitter Algorithm
- Tweetlio Twitter Features 2024
- Indi Digital Threadvertising Guide