What’s the average DM open rate on Twitter/X right now?
This blog post has been written by the person who has mapped all the strategies and examples in our cheatsheets
Understanding DM open rates on X is crucial for any creator looking to convert social media engagement into meaningful business outcomes.
The average DM open rate on X varies dramatically by follower count, engagement strategy, and message quality, with smaller accounts often seeing higher percentages but lower absolute numbers. And if you need to fast-track your growth on X, check all our cheatsheets.
Summary
X DM open rates have declined significantly with increased automation, but strategic creators still achieve 8-15% open rates by focusing on authentic engagement over cold outreach.
| Metric | Small Accounts (<5K) | Large Accounts (100K+) |
|---|---|---|
| Tweet-to-Profile Rate | 0.8-2.1% (higher engagement per impression) | 0.3-0.7% (lower engagement rate, higher volume) |
| Profile-to-DM Rate | 2.5-4.8% (more intimate audience) | 0.8-1.9% (broader, less connected audience) |
| DM Open Rate | 15-35% (personal connection) | 8-18% (brand recognition advantage) |
| DM Response Rate | 3-8% (quality over quantity) | 1-4% (volume challenges) |
| Cold DM Success Rate | 2-5% (if highly targeted) | 1-2% (scale challenges) |
| Conversion Rate (DM to Action) | 12-25% (trusted relationship) | 8-15% (authority influence) |
| Best Content Type for DMs | Personal stories, how-to threads | Value threads, data-driven content |
Steal What Works on 𝕏
Thousands of people have already tested what works.
Everything has been captured, mapped, and turned into cheat codes.
Grab them now.
What DM open rates can creators expect based on their follower count (under 5K, 10K, 100K+)?
DM open rates follow an inverse relationship with follower count—smaller accounts enjoy higher percentages while larger accounts benefit from greater absolute volume.
Creators with under 5K followers typically see DM open rates between 15-35%, with response rates of 3-8%. This happens because their audience feels more personally connected and each follower represents a more intentional relationship. When someone with 2,000 followers sends a DM, recipients often view it as genuine outreach rather than automated marketing.
The 10K-50K range represents a sweet spot where creators maintain 12-25% open rates while gaining enough volume to make DMs scalable. Accounts in this range often report the highest ROI from DM strategies because they balance personal connection with meaningful reach.
Accounts with 100K+ followers face the "celebrity problem"—open rates drop to 8-18% as followers expect less personal interaction. However, these accounts benefit from authority and brand recognition that can drive higher conversion rates even with lower open rates. A creator with 500K followers might get only 10% open rates but convert 15% of those who do open, making the strategy viable at scale.
The key insight: smaller accounts should focus on relationship-building through DMs, while larger accounts should treat DMs as a conversion funnel for their most engaged audience segments.
How many tweet impressions does it take before someone clicks on your profile?
The tweet-to-profile click rate averages 0.3-2.1% across all account sizes, meaning you need roughly 50-300 impressions per profile visit.
Content type dramatically affects this ratio. How-to threads and personal story content generate profile visits at 1.8-2.1% rates, while promotional content typically achieves only 0.3-0.6%. Value-driven threads that promise actionable insights consistently outperform other formats for driving profile curiosity.
Timing also matters significantly. Posts during peak engagement hours (Tuesday 3-6 AM, Sunday around midnight) see profile click rates up to 40% higher than off-peak posting. This suggests that when users are actively browsing rather than passively scrolling, they're more likely to investigate interesting profiles.
Account age and consistency play crucial roles. Accounts posting consistently for 6+ months see profile click rates 60% higher than newer accounts with similar content quality. This indicates that algorithmic trust and audience familiarity significantly impact profile visit behavior.
The most effective strategy combines value-driven content with strategic timing and consistent posting to maximize the impression-to-profile-visit conversion rate.
What percentage of profile visitors actually open the DM panel and send messages?
Only 0.8-4.8% of profile visitors actually open the DM panel, and just 15-35% of those send an initial message.
The profile-to-DM rate depends heavily on your call-to-action strategy and profile optimization. Accounts with clear "DM me for X" statements in their bio see 3-4x higher DM rates than those without explicit invitations. The most effective CTAs mention specific value propositions like "DM me for the template" or "Message me about consulting."
Profile design significantly impacts DM rates. Accounts with professional headshots, clear value propositions, and recent posting activity see 2.5-4.8% profile-to-DM rates, while incomplete or inactive profiles typically achieve only 0.8-1.2%.
Engagement history matters more than follower count for DM conversion. Profiles that actively respond to comments and engage in conversations see DM rates 70% higher than accounts that only broadcast content. This suggests that social proof of responsiveness encourages direct outreach.
Recent content quality drives immediate DM behavior. Profiles showcasing high-value recent tweets see same-day DM spikes, while accounts with stale or low-quality recent content experience delayed or reduced DM activity regardless of their overall follower count.
Of those who open DMs, how many actually respond, and what drives response rates?
DM response rates vary from 1-8% depending on message quality, timing, and relationship warmth, with the highest rates coming from value-first approaches.
| DM Type | Open Rate | Response Rate | Conversion Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cold Outreach (Generic) | 8-12% | 1-2% | 0.1-0.3% |
| Cold Outreach (Personalized) | 15-25% | 3-6% | 0.8-2.1% |
| Warm Follow-up (Previous Interaction) | 25-40% | 6-12% | 3-8% |
| Value-First (Free Resource) | 30-45% | 8-15% | 5-12% |
| Response to Their Content | 35-55% | 12-25% | 8-20% |
| Mutual Connection Introduction | 40-60% | 15-30% | 10-25% |
| Auto-DM to New Followers | 5-15% | 0.5-2% | 0.1-0.5% |
Message timing significantly affects response rates. DMs sent within 2 hours of someone engaging with your content see 3-4x higher response rates than messages sent days later. This suggests that immediate relevance and fresh context dramatically improve reception.
Personalization quality matters more than length. Messages that reference specific tweets, shared interests, or mutual connections achieve 5-8% response rates, while generic "great content" messages typically get 1-2% responses regardless of how polished they appear.
Don't reinvent
the wheel
There are proven patterns that work. Proven formats. Proven hooks.
Everything has been captured, mapped, and turned into cheat codes.
How have DM open rates changed over the past 12-18 months with increased automation?
DM open rates have declined by 35-50% since early 2024 as automation tools flooded the platform with generic outreach, creating widespread DM fatigue among users.
The rise of auto-DM tools has fundamentally changed user behavior. In January 2024, average DM open rates were 18-25% across account sizes. By July 2025, these rates dropped to 8-15% as users became increasingly skeptical of automated messages. The decline was steeper for larger accounts that became primary targets for automated outreach.
Platform changes have also impacted DM accessibility. X Premium users can now DM anyone regardless of follow status, but free accounts can only DM followers. This created a two-tier system where Premium users face higher competition for attention while free accounts must build organic relationships first.
User adaptation has been swift and decisive. The most successful creators pivoted from volume-based DM strategies to relationship-first approaches, focusing on genuine engagement before attempting direct outreach. Accounts that maintained authentic, value-driven messaging saw only 10-15% declines in open rates compared to 40-50% drops for automation-heavy accounts.
Anti-spam measures have become more sophisticated. X now limits DM frequency more aggressively, and users increasingly move valuable conversations to other platforms like email or scheduled calls, reducing the perceived value of DMs for serious business discussions.
What are the click-through rates from tweet impressions to DMs across different content types?
Click-through rates from tweet impressions to DM actions vary dramatically by content format, with interactive and educational content consistently outperforming promotional posts.
How-to threads achieve the highest impression-to-DM rates at 0.15-0.28%, often including explicit calls like "DM me for the template" or "Message me for the checklist." These threads work because they establish immediate value while creating natural conversation starters.
Personal story content generates 0.12-0.22% impression-to-DM rates by building emotional connection and relatability. Stories about failures, lessons learned, or behind-the-scenes insights prompt followers to share their own experiences or ask for advice through DMs.
Carousel posts (image threads) achieve 0.08-0.18% rates when they include actionable frameworks or step-by-step processes. The visual format makes complex information digestible while encouraging users to request additional resources privately.
Video content shows the lowest direct DM rates at 0.04-0.12% but often drives profile visits that convert to DMs later. Video content builds authority and trust that translates to higher-quality DM conversations even if the immediate conversion rate appears lower.
If your engagement feels flat, we've mapped all the formats that get traction.
How do X DM open rates compare to other platforms like Instagram, LinkedIn, and TikTok?
X DM open rates lag behind LinkedIn but outperform Instagram and TikTok for business-focused conversations, with platform context significantly affecting user expectations and response behavior.
| Platform | Avg Open Rate | Response Rate | Best Use Cases |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25-45% | 8-18% | B2B outreach, professional networking, job opportunities | |
| X (Twitter) | 8-18% | 3-8% | Content collaboration, quick questions, community building |
| 12-22% | 4-9% | Brand partnerships, visual content collaboration, lifestyle | |
| TikTok | 6-15% | 2-5% | Creator collaborations, viral content opportunities |
| Email (Cold) | 15-25% | 1-3% | Formal business proposals, detailed information sharing |
LinkedIn dominates for professional outreach because users expect business-related messages and the platform actively encourages networking. X users, however, expect more casual, community-focused interactions, making aggressive sales approaches less effective.
Instagram DMs benefit from visual context and lifestyle branding but suffer from algorithm limitations that bury messages from non-followers. X's real-time nature creates urgency that can drive faster responses when messages are relevant and timely.
The key difference lies in user intent: LinkedIn users anticipate professional outreach, X users seek authentic conversation, Instagram users expect brand engagement, and TikTok users prioritize entertainment value. Successful DM strategies align with these platform-specific expectations rather than using identical approaches across channels.
What DM open rate trends can we expect for X in 2026?
DM open rates are projected to stabilize at 6-12% by 2026 as AI-powered personalization improves message relevance while advanced filtering systems help users manage increased volume.
AI integration will create a bifurcated market where hyper-personalized messages achieve 15-25% open rates while generic outreach falls below 5%. Tools that analyze tweet history, engagement patterns, and shared interests will enable more relevant messaging, but the bar for "personalized" will rise significantly.
Platform monetization changes will likely introduce DM premium features, potentially including priority delivery for paid accounts, read receipts for business users, and enhanced analytics for creators. These changes could restore some DM effectiveness for serious business users while further marginalizing casual outreach.
User behavior will continue evolving toward platform-specific communication preferences. X may become primarily a discovery and relationship-building platform, with serious conversations migrating to email, calendar bookings, or dedicated business platforms. This shift would reduce overall DM volume while increasing the quality of remaining conversations.
Regulatory changes around automated messaging could introduce stricter consent requirements, similar to email marketing laws. This would likely improve user experience and open rates while creating higher barriers to entry for DM-based marketing strategies.
Do accounts with high reply and thread engagement see better DM open rates?
Accounts that actively engage in replies and threads see 40-70% higher DM open rates because consistent public interaction builds trust and demonstrates responsiveness to their community.
Public engagement serves as social proof for DM responsiveness. When users see an account regularly replying to comments, engaging in meaningful thread discussions, and maintaining conversations, they're more likely to expect and receive responses to direct messages. This creates a virtuous cycle where public engagement drives private conversation opportunities.
Thread participation significantly impacts DM quality. Accounts that contribute valuable insights to trending discussions often receive DMs from thread participants seeking deeper conversations. These warm leads convert at 3-5x higher rates than cold outreach because the initial thread interaction establishes mutual interest and relevance.
Reply consistency matters more than volume. Accounts that respond to 60% of mentions with thoughtful replies see better DM rates than accounts that reply to 90% of mentions with generic responses. Quality engagement signals genuine interest in conversation, which translates to more successful direct messaging.
The engagement-to-DM correlation strengthens over time. New accounts see minimal impact from high engagement, but accounts with 6+ months of consistent interaction patterns can leverage their reputation for significantly higher DM response rates and business outcomes.
Don't waste time guessing what converts. Steal all the proven strategies instead.
Which tweet formats drive the highest profile visits and subsequent DMs?
Educational threads with actionable takeaways consistently drive the highest profile-to-DM conversion rates, followed by personal story content that invites community sharing and discussion.
Value-driven "How to" threads with 5-10 tweets generate profile visits at 1.8-2.3% rates, with 15-25% of those visitors eventually sending DMs. The most effective threads promise specific outcomes like "How I gained 10K followers in 60 days" or "5 tools that doubled my productivity." These work because they establish expertise while creating natural conversation starters.
Personal vulnerability posts drive deeper engagement with 1.5-2.1% profile visit rates and exceptionally high DM quality. Tweets about failures, lessons learned, or challenging experiences prompt followers to share their own stories privately, leading to more meaningful connections and higher conversion potential.
Data-driven insights with visual elements achieve 1.2-1.9% profile visits when they challenge conventional wisdom or reveal surprising trends. Tweets like "I analyzed 1000 viral posts and found..." create authority while encouraging users to request the full data or methodology via DM.
Controversial takes or bold opinions generate high engagement but often result in lower-quality DMs filled with arguments rather than business opportunities. While these posts drive profile visits, they typically convert poorly for professional objectives.
What does a typical conversion funnel look like from tweet impressions to final conversion?
A realistic conversion funnel for a 100,000-impression tweet typically sees 1,500 engagements, 800 profile visits, 24 DMs, and 3-6 final conversions, representing a 0.003-0.006% end-to-end conversion rate.
| Funnel Stage | Rate | Volume (100K base) | Optimization Opportunities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tweet Impressions | 100% | 100,000 | Timing, hashtags, algorithm optimization |
| Engagements (likes, shares, replies) | 1.5% | 1,500 | Content quality, hooks, call-to-action |
| Profile Visits | 0.8% | 800 | Curiosity-driven content, username optimization |
| Bio Link Clicks | 0.15% | 150 | Clear value proposition, compelling CTA |
| DM Initiations | 0.024% | 24 | DM invitation in bio, conversation starters |
| DM Responses | 0.012% | 12 | Response speed, message quality, value-first approach |
| Final Conversions | 0.004% | 4 | Clear next steps, trust building, offer optimization |
The biggest drop-off occurs between profile visits and DMs, where 97% of interested users don't take action. This suggests that profile optimization—including clear value propositions, recent high-quality content, and explicit DM invitations—represents the highest-leverage improvement opportunity for most creators.
Content type dramatically affects funnel performance. Educational threads can achieve 2-3x higher conversion rates through each stage, while promotional content often underperforms by 50-70%. The most successful creators use value-driven content to fill the funnel, then nurture relationships through authentic engagement before introducing commercial opportunities.
Time decay significantly impacts conversion rates. Profile visits within 2 hours of tweet publication convert to DMs at 3-4x higher rates than visits after 24 hours, emphasizing the importance of immediate engagement and timely response strategies.
Fast-Track Your Growth on 𝕏
You don't need to test everything and waste time.
Fast-track your growth by downloading what already works.
Which tools and metrics provide the most reliable tracking for DM funnel performance?
X's native analytics provide basic impression and engagement data, but third-party tools like Hypefury, Tweet Hunter, and manual tracking spreadsheets offer more detailed DM funnel insights for serious creators.
X Analytics shows tweet impressions, profile visits, and engagement rates but doesn't track DM initiation or response rates. For basic funnel analysis, creators can calculate DM rates by dividing weekly DM volume by total weekly profile visits, though this method lacks precision for individual tweet performance.
Hypefury provides automated DM tracking with response rate analytics, making it valuable for creators using systematic DM strategies. The tool tracks which tweets generate the most DMs and which automated messages perform best, though it's limited to automated rather than organic DM analysis.
Manual tracking systems using Google Sheets or Notion databases often provide the most comprehensive insights. Successful creators track tweet URL, impression count, engagement rate, profile visits, DMs received, response rate, and final conversions. This approach requires more effort but enables precise optimization of high-performing content types.
UTM-tracked bio links offer indirect DM funnel insights by showing which tweets drive the most bio clicks, though this doesn't directly measure DM behavior. Creators can correlate bio link performance with DM volume to identify their most conversion-friendly content formats.
No idea what to tweet today? Browse hundreds of real viral examples.
Conclusion
DM open rates on X have fundamentally changed in 2025, requiring creators to prioritize authentic relationship-building over automated outreach tactics.
The most successful creators focus on value-first content that naturally encourages conversation, then nurture these relationships through personalized, relevant messaging rather than relying on volume-based DM strategies.
Sources
- 40 Twitter (X) Statistics for 2025
- 2025 Twitter Statistics (X): Key Insights & Trends
- 46 Twitter (X) Stats to Know in Marketing in 2025
- X (Twitter) stats that marketers need to know in 2025
- Twitter (X) Revenue, User Growth Statistics 2025
- Statistics and Facts About X/Twitter to Know in 2025
- Latest X (Twitter) Statistics in 2025
- 48 X (Twitter) Advertising Stats & Benchmarks for 2025
- How to DM on X (Twitter) in 2025
- Guide to X (Twitter) Direct Message Management
- X (Twitter) Statistics 2025: What Users & Marketers Must Know
- Twitter DM Limit: How Many Messages Can I Send on X?
- How to Pin and Unpin Direct Messages on X (Twitter)
- 5 Free Twitter Tools to Send Automated Direct Messages
- How to Grow on X/Twitter with Auto-DMs