What’s the average organic engagement rate on Twitter/X?

This blog post has been written by the person who has mapped all the strategies and examples in our cheatsheets

Twitter/X organic engagement rates have dropped dramatically since 2022, with most accounts now seeing rates between 0.015% and 2.43% depending on follower count and niche.

Understanding these benchmarks becomes critical when platform changes continue to favor paid content over organic reach. The data reveals specific patterns across account sizes, industries, and content formats that directly impact your growth strategy.

And if you need to fast-track your growth on X, check all our cheatsheets.

What exactly does "organic engagement rate" mean on Twitter/X, and how is it calculated?

Organic engagement rate measures the percentage of people who interact with your tweets without any paid promotion behind the content.

The precise calculation is: (Total Engagements ÷ Total Impressions) × 100%. Engagements include likes, retweets, replies, clicks, and profile visits generated from a specific tweet. Impressions represent how many times that tweet appeared in users' feeds or search results.

Most analytics tools also offer a follower-based formula: (Total Engagements ÷ Total Followers) × 100%. This method provides higher percentages but less accuracy since it assumes all followers see every tweet, which Twitter/X's algorithm doesn't guarantee.

The impression-based calculation gives you the true performance metric because it reflects actual reach versus engagement, accounting for Twitter/X's algorithmic filtering that shows your content to only a fraction of your followers.

What's the current average organic engagement rate on Twitter/X in 2025 for small accounts under 10K followers?

Small accounts under 10K followers achieve significantly higher engagement rates than larger accounts, with nano accounts (under 1K) reaching 5.60% and accounts between 5K-10K averaging 2.43%.

Accounts with fewer than 1,000 followers benefit from Twitter/X's algorithm favoring smaller creators and the intimate relationship these accounts maintain with their audience. Every follower represents a more significant percentage of the total audience, creating higher engagement probability.

The 5K-20K range experiences the steepest engagement decline, dropping from 5.60% to 2.43%. This happens because the algorithm begins treating these accounts as "established" rather than emerging creators, reducing organic reach while the audience becomes less intimate.

Small accounts also see higher click-through rates and profile visits because followers feel more connected to creators they can realistically interact with, unlike mega-influencers who receive thousands of comments per post.

Not sure what content to post? We've already collected what works in our cheatsheets.

How does the engagement rate change for medium accounts between 10K and 100K followers?

Medium accounts between 10K and 100K followers see engagement rates stabilize around 2.15%, representing the transition zone where accounts lose nano-influencer benefits but haven't yet achieved macro-influencer status.

The 20K-100K range shows minimal variation in engagement rates, hovering between 2.15% and 2.05%. This plateau occurs because Twitter/X's algorithm treats these accounts similarly, providing moderate organic reach without the preferential treatment given to smaller creators or the established presence of mega-accounts.

Medium accounts face the challenge of competing with both nano-influencers (who get algorithmic boosts) and established brands (who have larger marketing budgets) for the same audience attention. This creates a "middle ground" effect where growth becomes more challenging.

Successful medium accounts typically compensate for lower engagement rates by focusing on niche expertise, consistent posting schedules, and building genuine community through replies and interactions rather than relying purely on algorithmic reach.

What's the typical engagement rate for large accounts over 100K followers, and does it plateau?

Large accounts over 100K followers experience a clear plateau, with engagement rates stabilizing around 2.05% for accounts with 100K-1M followers and dropping only slightly to 1.97% for mega-accounts over 1M followers.

This plateau effect occurs because Twitter/X's algorithm caps organic reach for large accounts to prevent any single creator from dominating users' feeds. Even viral tweets from mega-accounts typically reach only 5-15% of their total follower base organically.

Large accounts compensate for lower engagement rates through sheer volume—a 1.97% engagement rate on 2 million followers still generates 39,400 interactions per tweet, far exceeding smaller accounts' total numbers despite lower percentages.

The plateau also reflects audience behavior changes. Followers of large accounts are less likely to engage because they assume their comment will be lost among thousands of others, creating a psychological barrier to interaction that doesn't exist with smaller creators.

How do engagement rates vary by niche—like tech, beauty, fitness, or finance—and what are some realistic examples?

How does Twitter/X's organic engagement compare to platforms like Instagram, LinkedIn, or TikTok right now?

Twitter/X currently ranks third among major social platforms for organic engagement, with an average rate of 1.8% compared to Instagram's 3.5%, LinkedIn's 3.4%, and TikTok's 1.5%.

Instagram maintains the highest engagement rates due to its visual-first format and algorithm that still prioritizes recent posts from followed accounts. LinkedIn's professional context creates higher-quality interactions, with users more likely to engage meaningfully with content relevant to their careers.

Twitter/X's 1.8% rate reflects the platform's transition toward algorithmic feeds and increased competition from promoted content. The character limit also affects engagement patterns—users can quickly consume and move past tweets, unlike Instagram posts that encourage longer viewing times.

TikTok's lower 1.5% rate surprises many, but it reflects the platform's massive scale and the difficulty of achieving meaningful engagement when videos receive millions of views. TikTok optimizes for watch time rather than traditional engagement metrics like likes and comments.

Don't waste time guessing what converts. Steal all the proven strategies instead.

What were the average organic engagement rates on Twitter/X in 2022 and 2023, and how have they evolved recently?

Twitter/X engagement rates have experienced a dramatic decline, dropping from 0.035% in 2022 to 0.029% in 2023, and further down to 0.015% in early 2025—representing a 57% decrease over three years.

The 2022-2023 decline coincided with Twitter's acquisition and subsequent algorithm changes that prioritized paid content over organic reach. Many users also reduced their posting frequency due to platform uncertainty, creating less competition but also less overall engagement.

The 2024-2025 period saw the steepest decline as Twitter Blue's launch gave verified accounts priority placement in feeds, effectively reducing organic reach for non-paying users. This created a two-tier system where organic content struggled to achieve previous engagement levels.

Industry experts attribute the continued decline to increased competition from promoted tweets, changes in user behavior toward more passive consumption, and the algorithm's preference for content that keeps users on the platform longer rather than driving external engagement.

Are there any signs that the organic engagement rate is expected to rise, drop, or stay flat heading into 2026?

Industry analyses project organic engagement rates will remain flat or continue declining through 2026, with no major platform changes anticipated to reverse the current trend toward paid content prioritization.

Twitter/X's business model increasingly depends on advertising revenue and subscription services, creating structural incentives to limit organic reach in favor of paid promotion. The platform's recent focus on creator monetization also suggests organic content will serve more as a funnel to paid features.

Algorithm updates consistently favor content that generates immediate platform engagement over external clicks or conversions, indicating the platform prioritizes user retention over creator success metrics. This trend shows no signs of reversing based on current platform statements and competitor analysis.

The only potential positive factor is increased competition from other platforms, which could force Twitter/X to improve creator conditions to prevent user migration. However, no concrete changes have been announced that would significantly impact organic engagement rates.

What kinds of tweets—like polls, carousels, plain text, videos, or threads—tend to get higher engagement organically?

• Tweets with images: Generate 18% more clicks, 89% more likes, and 150% more retweets compared to text-only posts, making visual content the most reliable engagement booster
• Video content: Achieves up to 10× higher engagement than plain text tweets, with short-form videos (under 2 minutes) performing best for organic reach
• Twitter threads: Can double engagement rates versus standalone tweets by keeping content visible longer in feeds and encouraging sequential engagement
• Interactive polls: Drive high engagement through built-in participation mechanisms, often resulting in increased profile visits and follow rates
• Quote tweets with commentary: Perform better than simple retweets by adding personal perspective and encouraging discussion in replies

If your engagement feels flat, we've mapped all the formats that get traction.

Does posting frequency or time of day significantly affect engagement rate on Twitter/X?

Posting frequency and timing significantly impact engagement rates, with optimal posting schedules varying based on audience demographics and content type.

Brands posting approximately 331 tweets per week (roughly 47 tweets daily) achieve median engagement rates around 0.045%, suggesting higher frequency can improve overall performance when content quality remains consistent. However, this applies mainly to established brands with content teams, not individual creators.

Peak engagement windows occur on Wednesday at 9 AM, with Tuesday and Thursday mornings also performing well. Weekday mornings consistently outperform afternoons and weekends, as users check Twitter/X during commutes and work breaks when they're more likely to engage actively.

Individual creators typically see better results with 2-4 high-quality tweets per day rather than high-frequency posting, as algorithm penalties can apply to accounts that post excessively without corresponding engagement. The key is matching posting frequency to your audience's consumption patterns rather than following generic best practices.

How do Twitter Blue or Verified accounts influence average engagement, if at all?

Twitter Blue verification provides prioritized display in the "For You" feed, potentially increasing impressions, but doesn't guarantee higher engagement rates since content quality remains the primary driver of interactions.

Verified accounts receive algorithmic preference in feed placement, particularly in replies and search results, which can boost impression counts by 20-40% according to early user reports. However, higher impressions don't automatically translate to better engagement rates if the content doesn't resonate with the expanded audience.

The blue checkmark can create a credibility perception that encourages some users to engage more readily, particularly for B2B or professional content where authority matters. Conversely, some users actively avoid engaging with paid verification accounts due to platform politics or authenticity concerns.

Most verified accounts report increased reach rather than improved engagement rates, suggesting Twitter Blue functions more as a distribution amplifier than an engagement enhancer. The $8 monthly cost may only be worthwhile for accounts that can monetize the additional impressions effectively.

Are there any concrete benchmarks or goals to aim for when trying to improve organic engagement on Twitter/X?

No idea what to tweet today? Browse hundreds of real viral examples.

Conclusion

Sources

1. Online Advertising Guide - Twitter Engagement Rate Calculator
2. TweetPeek - Twitter Engagement Rate 2025 Guide
3. Phlanx - Twitter Engagement Calculator
4. Hootsuite - Average Engagement Rates by Platform
5. Rival IQ - Good Twitter Engagement Rates
6. Sprout Social - Twitter Statistics
7. Social Insider - Social Media Benchmarks
8. Product London - Twitter Threads Engagement
9. Socinator - Interactive Twitter Polls
10. Buffer - Best Times to Post
11. Social Media Today - Twitter Blue Prioritization
12. Qoruz - Engagement Rate Benchmarks 2025