Is Tibo really making $1,000,000 per month?

What does Tibo actually mean when he says he makes $1M per month?

Tibo’s $1 million figure refers to the combined MRR of his SaaS portfolio, not $1 million of personal income landing in his account every month.

When Thibault Louis-Lucas, better known as Tibo Maker, announced the milestone, he named Revid, Outrank, SuperX, PostSyncer and Feather as the products behind it. He had already sold Tweet Hunter and Taplio, so those older businesses were not being added to the new portfolio total.

Tibo has kept using the same definition since then. In one of his more recent TMAKER articles, he wrote that he runs “a portfolio at $1M MRR across 5 products.” Another recent post described his operating stack for managing a “$1m MRR portfolio.” So this is still how Tibo presents the business today, rather than an old milestone that other people keep repeating after he stopped using it himself.

The wording gets distorted when “Tibo runs a $1M MRR portfolio” becomes “Tibo makes $1M every month.” Those two sentences describe very different things. The first is the claim we can investigate from product revenue. The second would require knowing Tibo’s ownership percentages, costs, taxes and distributions.

Is Tibo’s $1M MRR actually verified?

Tibo’s $1M MRR is not independently verified as a complete portfolio number.

The biggest limitation is simple: Revid and Outrank provide nearly all of the claimed revenue, yet there is no public Stripe-connected dashboard, TrustMRR page or equivalent payment-provider verification for either one.

SaaS Distribution, which tracks founder revenue claims and their provenance, currently records Outrank at $300,000 MRR but explicitly labels the number as founder-stated rather than Stripe-verified. Revid’s large public MRR figures have the same problem.

There is some verified revenue inside the portfolio. Kaeda currently lists SuperX at $22,094 MRR and says the number was Stripe-verified. That is useful because Tibo had independently disclosed SuperX at roughly $22,000 around the same period, so at least one public revenue claim lines up closely with payment data.

Still, SuperX is a small piece of a $1 million portfolio. We can test whether the larger claims make sense, and there is quite a lot to test them against, but we cannot call the whole $1M figure proven.

Do Tibo’s five SaaS products actually add up to $1M MRR?

Tibo’s disclosed product numbers get remarkably close to $1 million MRR, although they were published at different times rather than taken from one synchronized billing snapshot.

This is the strongest part of the case. Revid reached a stated $680,000 MRR. Outrank later reached the high-$200,000s before crossing $300,000. SuperX reported more than $20,000, PostSyncer $7,000, and Tibo had previously put Feather around $10,000.

Using $680,000 for Revid, $274,000 for Outrank, $22,000 for SuperX, $7,000 for PostSyncer and $10,000 for Feather gives approximately $993,000 MRR.

That leaves a gap of only $7,000, or 0.7%.

The figures were not all reported on the same day, so $993,000 should not be presented as an audited portfolio total. But the gap is small enough that normal growth in just one of the smaller products, or another few percentage points at Outrank, would take the combined portfolio through $1 million.

Tibo had also disclosed a much earlier portfolio breakdown in Starter Story. At that point he put Revid around $400,000, Outrank above $200,000, SuperX around $13,000, PostSyncer at $1,500 and Feather around $10,000. The businesses therefore did not suddenly appear at $1M from nowhere. Several of the individual revenue trajectories were visible before the headline milestone.

Product	Relevant disclosed MRR	What we can actually say
Revid	Up to $680K	Founder-reported, by far the biggest piece
Outrank	$300K+	Founder-reported, second-biggest piece
SuperX	$22K at the comparable stage	$22,094 independently listed as Stripe-verified
PostSyncer	$7K	Founder-reported
Feather	About $10K	Older founder-reported figure

Is Revid really making around $600K per month?

Revid making around $600,000 per month looks commercially plausible, but this is still the biggest number we have to take from Tibo himself.

Tibo first disclosed Revid at $680,000 MRR with a team of four. A later disclosure put the product at $600,000 MRR and described it as profitable. And yes, the drop is worth noticing: Revid apparently lost about $80,000 of recurring revenue, nearly 12%, rather than producing an endless sequence of perfectly rising screenshots.

Revid also looks big enough today for a several-hundred-thousand-dollar SaaS business. The latest complete Semrush dataset estimates 701,290 visits in one month, up about 20% from the previous month. Visitors averaged 4.92 pages and more than 11 minutes per session. Semrush also shows a large direct-traffic share, which is more encouraging for an established product than traffic coming almost entirely from one viral search page.

Revid itself says more than 30,000 videos are published through the product every month and that 14,258+ users have used it. Those are company-reported usage figures, so we should not turn them into fake precision about paying customers.

Put the traffic, usage and pricing together and a $600K business is believable. There is no obvious mismatch between the visible size of Revid and the revenue Tibo says it generates.

Does Revid have enough paying users to make $600K MRR?

Revid could reach $600K MRR with several thousand paying customers, which fits the scale of the product we can see today.

Revid currently sells plans starting at $39 per month, with an Ultra plan at $199 and higher credit usage available for heavier users. If every customer paid only $39, the product would need about 15,385 subscriptions to reach $600,000. At $99 average revenue per customer, it would need roughly 6,061. At $199, it would need just over 3,000.

The real mix will sit somewhere between those examples.

Revid’s own website says it is loved by 14,258+ users. That wording does not mean 14,258 active subscribers, so we should not use it as proof. But $600,000 divided across 14,258 users equals about $42 per user, barely above Revid’s $39 entry price.

Combined with roughly 700,000 monthly website visits and more than 30,000 videos published each month, the required customer base does not look far-fetched.

Average monthly revenue per paying customer	Paying customers needed for $600K MRR
$39	15,385
$50	12,000
$75	8,000
$99	6,061
$199	3,015

Is Outrank really making $300K per month?

Outrank at roughly $300,000 MRR also passes the basic reality check unusually well.

Tibo disclosed Outrank above $300,000 MRR with more than 2,500 websites using the platform. That followed earlier public milestones around $200,000 and $274,000, so the $300K figure belongs to a visible growth sequence rather than a single isolated claim.

Outrank remains very active now. Its current homepage says the platform has created more than 750,000 articles, added more than 25,000 backlinks and generated 750 million organic views for customers. Those are first-party product metrics, but they show a large amount of ongoing usage.

The 2,500-website figure is particularly useful because Outrank’s pricing lets us check the revenue claim from another direction.

At exactly $300,000 MRR across 2,500 websites, Outrank would average $120 per website per month.

Its core plan currently costs $99.

That leaves only about $21 of extra monthly revenue per website to explain.

Can Outrank’s pricing really produce $300K MRR?

Yes. Outrank’s current pricing makes $300K MRR across 2,500 websites quite easy to reconcile.

The base subscription is $99 per month for 30 articles. Customers can pay more for higher publishing volume and other features. Current add-ons include larger article allowances, premium backlink access and additional SEO products.

A portfolio of 2,500 sites paying only the $99 base price would already generate $247,500 per month before discounts. Reaching $300,000 requires another $52,500 across the whole installed base.

That works out to an average uplift of just $21 per site.

Some multi-site customers receive volume discounts, so the arithmetic will not be exactly that clean. On the other hand, many customers can buy considerably more than $21 of extra capacity. An average bill around $120 therefore looks completely normal for the current pricing structure.

This is one of the better checks on Tibo’s numbers. The reported MRR, the reported number of websites and the public price of the product fit each other surprisingly well.

Are SuperX, PostSyncer and Feather making serious money too?

SuperX, PostSyncer and Feather appear to contribute tens of thousands of dollars per month together, enough to close a small portfolio gap but nowhere near enough to fake a $1M total by themselves.

SuperX is the strongest of the three. Tibo disclosed it at $22,000 MRR, Kaeda later showed $22,094 as Stripe-verified, and Tibo said more recently that SuperX had crossed $30,000 MRR after a period when growth had stalled.

PostSyncer was reported at $7,000 MRR earlier in the year. The product has kept developing since then: its current API covers more than ten social platforms and its app now claims to be used by 75,000+ creators. We do not have a fresh trustworthy MRR number, so using $7,000 today would probably create false precision.

Feather is murkier. Tibo previously put it around $10,000 per month after acquiring the Notion-to-blog product. There is no equally clean recent MRR disclosure.

These smaller businesses help the $1M case without deciding it. Revid and Outrank still have to be roughly as large as Tibo says.

Has Tibo ever shown revenue that was independently verified?

Yes. SuperX gives us one useful example where Tibo’s public MRR and independent payment verification line up closely.

Kaeda currently lists SuperX at $22,094 MRR and labels the figure Stripe-verified. Tibo’s own public number around the same stage was $22,000.

A difference of $94 on a $22K business is basically nothing.

That does not verify Revid or Outrank by association. Each business needs to stand on its own evidence. But it does weaken the idea that Tibo simply invents whatever revenue figure looks good on social media.

It also gives us a useful calibration point. Where we can see independent payment data, Tibo’s rounded public disclosure was accurate to well under 1%.

The problem is coverage. Roughly 90% of the claimed portfolio sits in businesses where comparable public verification is still missing.

Do Tibo’s French company accounts support a business this large?

Yes. TMAKER’s official French accounts show that Tibo was already running a highly profitable software business before the $1M MRR milestone.

Pappers, using filings from French corporate registries, reports €1.02 million of net profit for TMAKER in 2025. The same accounts show €1.08 million in cash, €861,000 of equity and only €19,100 of financial debt.

Those are much harder numbers than an X post.

They still cannot prove $12 million of annual recurring revenue. TMAKER obtained partial confidentiality for its accounts, so revenue itself is hidden. The company structure also means money moving through TMAKER does not necessarily map one-to-one to the gross MRR of every product in which Tibo has an interest.

The filings answer a more basic question decisively: TMAKER is already a substantial, profitable software company with seven-figure annual earnings.

Pappers also currently shows TMAKER as president of the French entities behind Outrank and Revid. The other directors differ by company, which fits Tibo’s co-maker model where he builds products with operating partners rather than owning every business alone.

Is Tibo still around $1M MRR today?

Tibo still says he runs a $1M MRR portfolio, but the exact current total is harder for us to reconstruct than the original crossing.

This is where the answer gets slightly less clean.

Tibo continues to use the $1M figure in recent material. His current website also shows an active portfolio consisting of Revid, Outrank, SuperX, PostSyncer, Feather and the newer Bazzly. The businesses themselves are clearly still operating.

But some underlying numbers have moved. Revid went from its $680K peak to a later $600K disclosure. Outrank moved upward through $300K. SuperX later crossed $30K. We have no comparably recent clean number for PostSyncer or Feather, while Bazzly is too new for us to attach reliable revenue to it.

If we mechanically combine the latest public numbers we can find for each older product, we do not get a clean, synchronized $1 million snapshot. The figures come from different periods and leave too many unknowns.

As seen above, the evidence for the original crossing is stronger because the product-level disclosures around that period nearly add up on their own. For the exact total today, Tibo’s own current statement is ahead of what outsiders can independently reconstruct.

Could Tibo be inflating the total by calling everything MRR?

There is no evidence that Tibo is improperly counting one-time sales as MRR, although outsiders cannot audit exactly how every subscription is classified.

This is worth checking because both Revid and Outrank have more complicated billing than a SaaS with one flat monthly plan. Revid sells subscriptions with different credit allowances. Outrank sells recurring plans and add-ons, while also offering some services that are not naturally recurring.

A proper MRR calculation should spread annual subscriptions across twelve months and exclude genuinely one-off purchases.

We cannot see TMAKER’s billing logic, so we cannot confirm every classification. But there is also no public example where Tibo appears to have taken a one-time $500 payment and counted it as $500 of recurring monthly revenue.

At this scale, the accounting definition can still move the headline. A 5% difference in what gets classified as recurring revenue would equal $50,000 per month. So $1M is better treated as a credible order-of-magnitude claim than as a figure verified to the last dollar.

Does Tibo personally keep $1 million every month?

No. Even if the $1M portfolio MRR is accurate, Tibo’s personal monthly income is clearly much lower than $1 million.

The products have co-makers and separate company structures. Tibo has explained that his model is to partner with technical operators while he focuses heavily on distribution, and the French corporate records for Revid and Outrank show other executives alongside TMAKER.

Then there are normal business costs. Revid pays for AI video generation and infrastructure. Outrank has content-generation, backlink and affiliate costs. SuperX depends on the paid X API. The portfolio also has employees, contractors, software, payment processing, refunds and taxes.

Revenue therefore has to pass through both costs and ownership splits before we get anywhere near Tibo’s personal take.

We do not know his exact equity in each product, and we do not know how much profit each company distributes. Any estimate of his personal monthly income would be mostly guesswork.

So when people say “Tibo makes $1 million per month,” the sentence overshoots what the evidence says. “Tibo co-owns and runs SaaS products generating around $1 million in combined MRR” is much closer.

So is Tibo really making $1,000,000 per month?

Mostly yes if we mean Tibo’s SaaS portfolio generating roughly $1M MRR; no if we mean Tibo personally taking home $1 million every month.

The original portfolio milestone looks credible. The individual product disclosures around that period came within roughly 1% of $1 million when combined. Revid and Outrank are visibly large enough for their claimed revenue to be plausible. Outrank’s customer count and pricing fit its reported MRR particularly well. SuperX gives us one smaller example where Tibo’s public figure was almost identical to Stripe-verified data. TMAKER’s official accounts separately show more than €1 million of annual net profit.

There is still one important hole: nobody outside the businesses has publicly verified the Revid and Outrank billing dashboards, and those two products carry most of the claim.

Today’s exact total is also harder to prove from public numbers because different products have moved in different directions and the disclosures are no longer synchronized. Tibo continues to call it a $1M MRR portfolio, and there is nothing fresh that seriously contradicts that scale, but outsiders cannot currently confirm whether the live number is $950K, $1.0M, $1.1M or something nearby.

Our conclusion is quite sharp. Tibo probably did cross $1 million in combined monthly recurring revenue, and the scale of the portfolio looks real. The exact current MRR remains founder-reported, while the idea that Tibo personally pockets $1 million every month is unsupported.