What’s the average rate of cold DMs resulting in a booked call on Twitter/X?
This blog post has been written by the person who has mapped all the strategies and examples in our cheatsheets
Cold DM outreach on X (formerly Twitter) has become increasingly challenging in 2025, with reply rates dropping from approximately 10% in 2024 to just 8% currently due to algorithm changes and stricter rate limits.
The complete funnel from DM to booked call reveals that only 0.64% of cold DMs result in scheduled meetings, meaning you need roughly 156 DMs to book one call with current industry averages. And if you need to fast-track your growth on X, check all our cheatsheets.
Summary
Cold DM conversion rates on X have declined significantly since late 2024 algorithm updates, with current industry benchmarks showing substantial challenges for creators and businesses.
| Metric | 2025 Average | Key Insight |
|---|---|---|
| Tweet Impressions Reach | ~10% of followers | Organic visibility severely constrained by algorithm |
| Detail Expands Rate | 0.5-1% of impressions | Very few users click to read full tweets |
| Profile Visit Rate | 0.5-1% of impressions | 10-20 profile visits per 2,000 impressions |
| Cold DM Reply Rate | 8% (down from 10-12% in 2024) | 20% decline due to algorithm changes |
| Reply-to-Call Booking Rate | 11.7% of replies | 0.64% overall booking rate per DM sent |
| Call Show-up Rate | 70-80% | Standard B2B outreach performance |
| DMs Needed per Call | 80-156 DMs | Varies significantly based on targeting quality |
Steal What Works on 𝕏
Thousands of people have already tested what works.
Everything has been captured, mapped, and turned into cheat codes.
Grab them now.
How many people actually see tweets with call-to-action links, and what percentage read the full content?
Organic reach on X has been severely impacted by algorithm changes, with only approximately 10% of followers seeing any given tweet in 2025.
For tweets containing call-to-action links or profile mentions, the visibility remains consistent with overall organic reach patterns. However, high-profile accounts or viral threads may occasionally exceed 30% reach, though most content creators see less than 15% organic reach.
The "detail expand" rate (clicking to read full tweets) occurs in roughly 0.5-1% of total impressions. This means that out of 2,000 impressions, only 10-20 people will actually click to read the complete tweet content.
These metrics highlight why many creators struggle to convert their follower count into meaningful engagement, as the vast majority of their audience never sees their content organically.
What influences profile visit conversion rates when users do read tweets?
Profile clicks average 0.5-1% of tweet impressions, translating to approximately 10-20 profile visits per 2,000 impressions.
The conversion from profile click to actual engagement (DM or reply) ranges from 10-20%, driven primarily by three key factors. Clear bio messaging that immediately communicates value proposition performs best, with streamlined bios achieving higher conversion rates than cluttered profiles.
Social proof elements like follower count, verification status, and pinned content showcasing credibility significantly impact visitor behavior. Profiles with focused, single call-to-action elements outperform those with multiple competing messages.
Recent activity and content relevance also influence conversion, as visitors quickly assess whether the account regularly produces valuable content in their area of interest.
What are the current click-through rates for bio links in cold outreach funnels?
Link-in-bio tools like Linktree and Bio.fm average 1-3% click-through rates from profile visits in 2025.
This represents a significant funnel bottleneck, as most profile visitors don't proceed to external links. Streamlined bios with single, focused CTAs consistently outperform complex link trees with multiple options.
The most effective bio link strategies involve clear value propositions that directly address visitor pain points, creating urgency or curiosity gaps that compel clicks.
Mobile optimization has become crucial, as the majority of X users access the platform via mobile devices where bio links must be immediately accessible and compelling.
How many profile visitors convert to DM senders without additional prompts?
With optimized profiles, 5-10% of visitors will send cold DMs or replies organically without additional prompting.
This conversion rate depends heavily on profile optimization elements including clear value propositions, visible social proof, and strategic use of pinned content that demonstrates expertise or results.
Profiles that explicitly invite DMs ("DM me for X") see higher organic conversion rates compared to those that don't provide clear next steps for interested visitors.
The quality of recent tweets also impacts organic DM conversion, as visitors often review recent activity before deciding to reach out.
Not sure what content to post? We've already collected what works in our cheatsheets.
Don't reinvent
the wheel
There are proven patterns that work. Proven formats. Proven hooks.
Everything has been captured, mapped, and turned into cheat codes.
What are the current cold DM reply rates on X, and how do they compare to 2024?
Cold DM reply rates on X have dropped to approximately 8% in 2025, down from 10-12% in 2024.
This 20% decline reflects the impact of late 2024 algorithm updates that prioritized paid content and implemented stricter rate limits for DM activity. The platform's shift toward subscription-based features has also affected organic outreach effectiveness.
Industry data shows this decline mirrors broader engagement decreases across the platform, with overall engagement rates dropping from 0.029% in 2024 to 0.015% in 2025.
Despite the decline, X still maintains higher reply rates than Instagram DMs (5-10%) but lags behind LinkedIn InMail (12-15%) for cold outreach effectiveness.
What percentage of DM replies actually convert to booked calls?
From those who reply to cold DMs, approximately 11.7% agree to book calls, resulting in an overall booking rate of 0.64% per DM sent.
This conversion rate varies significantly based on the quality of the initial DM, follow-up strategy, and the clarity of the call-to-action. Clear, specific CTAs like "15-minute call to discuss X" perform better than vague requests.
Show-up rates for booked calls remain consistent with B2B standards at 70-80%, meaning not all scheduled calls actually occur due to no-shows or last-minute cancellations.
The reply-to-booking conversion represents one of the most critical bottlenecks in the entire cold outreach funnel, requiring strategic optimization of follow-up messaging.
How do niche creators compare to general business accounts in DM conversion rates?
Niche creators significantly outperform general business accounts across all conversion metrics.
| Account Type | Reply Rate | Reply-to-Booking Rate | Overall Effectiveness |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niche Creators | 12-15% | 15-20% | Higher trust and authority |
| General Business | 5-8% | 10-12% | Perceived as more salesy |
| Industry Experts | 10-13% | 12-18% | Credibility advantage |
| Service Providers | 6-9% | 8-15% | Varies by service type |
| SaaS Companies | 7-10% | 10-14% | Depends on product-market fit |
| Consultants | 9-12% | 12-16% | Personal brand impact |
| Agencies | 5-8% | 8-12% | High competition impact |
Niche creators benefit from established authority and trust within their specific domains, making their outreach feel more authentic and valuable to recipients.
How many cold DMs does it typically take to book one sales call?
Based on the 0.64% overall booking rate, it takes approximately 156 cold DMs to book one call using average industry performance.
However, well-optimized accounts with proper targeting and messaging can reduce this to 80-100 DMs per call. This improvement comes from better prospect qualification, more personalized messaging, and strategic follow-up sequences.
Top performers achieve even better ratios through hyper-personalization, often spending 10+ minutes researching each prospect before sending customized outreach messages.
The volume approach (high-quantity, low-personalization) requires significantly more DMs but can work for businesses with large addressable markets and systematic processes.
Don't waste time guessing what converts. Steal all the proven strategies instead.
How does Twitter's cold outreach compare to LinkedIn and Instagram for booking calls?
Twitter occupies the middle ground between LinkedIn and Instagram for cold outreach effectiveness in 2025.
| Platform | Reply Rate | Booking Rate | DMs per Call | Best Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LinkedIn InMail | 12-15% | 15-25% | 28-56 | B2B professional outreach |
| Twitter/X DMs | 8% | 11.7% | 107 | Thought leadership audience |
| Instagram DMs | 5-10% | 5-10% | 100-200 | Visual/lifestyle businesses |
| Cold Email | 1-5% | 10-15% | 200-400 | Scalable outreach |
| Cold Calls | 2.3% | 5-10% | 400-800 | High-value prospects |
LinkedIn remains superior for B2B professional outreach due to its business-focused environment and professional context. Twitter works best for reaching thought leaders and creators within specific niches.
Fast-Track Your Growth on 𝕏
You don't need to test everything and waste time.
Fast-track your growth by downloading what already works.
What are the top 3 bottlenecks in Twitter cold DM funnels and their solutions?
The three most critical bottlenecks preventing DM success are targeting precision, message personalization, and follow-up execution.
1. Poor Targeting
Broad prospect lists dilute relevance and reduce reply rates significantly. The solution involves building precise Ideal Customer Profile segments and scraping active participants from relevant thread discussions rather than generic follower lists.
2. Weak Personalization
Generic messaging fails to resonate in an increasingly crowded DM environment. Effective personalization requires the RSVP framework: Relevance (mention specific content), Simplicity (clear one-sentence value prop), Value (immediate benefit), and Personalization (specific details about their situation).
3. Inadequate Follow-up
Most campaigns lose momentum after the initial message, missing 30% potential conversions. Optimal follow-up sequences include 2-3 value-added messages spaced appropriately, but stop after three attempts to avoid appearing spam-like.
If your engagement feels flat, we've mapped all the formats that get traction.
How have engagement and DM patterns changed since late 2024 algorithm updates?
X implemented significant algorithm changes in late 2024 that fundamentally altered organic reach and DM effectiveness.
Organic reach declined approximately 20% as the algorithm began prioritizing paid content and verified accounts. This change particularly impacted creators without X Premium subscriptions.
Detail expands and profile clicks per impression decreased by roughly 15%, indicating users are engaging less deeply with content. DM reply rates fell from the 10% range to current 8% averages due to stricter rate limits and increased user fatigue from promotional messages.
The platform's shift toward video content and the introduction of a dedicated video tab has also affected how users consume and interact with text-based content and outreach attempts.
What should creators expect for cold DM conversion rates by 2026?
Projections for 2026 suggest continued decline in cold DM effectiveness unless creators adapt their strategies significantly.
Reply rates are expected to drop to 5-7% by 2026 unless offset by AI-driven personalization tools and more sophisticated targeting methods. Reply-to-booking rates may stabilize around 10-12% as the market adjusts to new communication patterns.
The trend will likely necessitate deeper prospect targeting, richer personalization strategies, and hybrid paid-organic approaches to maintain effectiveness. Creators who invest in building genuine authority and thought leadership will likely see better sustained performance.
AI integration in both outreach creation and spam detection will create an arms race between automated personalization and filtering systems, requiring more authentic, value-driven approaches to succeed.
Still struggling to grow? We mapped hundreds of accounts that cracked the code.
Conclusion
The landscape of cold DM outreach on X has become significantly more challenging in 2025, with declining reply rates and increased competition for attention.
Success now requires sophisticated targeting, genuine personalization, and strategic follow-up sequences rather than high-volume generic approaches. Creators who adapt to these new realities by focusing on authority building and authentic value delivery will maintain effectiveness despite platform changes.
Sources
- What's the Average Cold Email Response Rate in 2025? - GMass
- Cold Email Reply Rate (ULTIMATE GUIDE 2025) - Breakcold
- Cold Email Vs Twitter Cold Dms [2024] - ColdClose
- What Is the Average Response Rate of Cold Emails in 2025? - BrandWell
- Cold Email vs Twitter: Which is Better for Leads - Growleady
- X (Twitter) stats that marketers need to know in 2025 - Hootsuite
- 46 Twitter (X) Stats to Know in Marketing in 2025 - Sprout Social
- Social Media Benchmarks For 2025 - Social Insider
- What Is A Bad, Good & Average Cold Email Conversion Rate? [2025 Guide] - Breakcold
- Cold Email Conversion Rate: 2025 Benchmarks & Tips - Smartreach
- The Top Cold Calling Success Rates for 2025 Explained - Cognism
- Cold Email Conversion Rate: Stats and Tips for Success - Instantly